AI Rate Professor

English

Carrie Wasinger

ENGL2 · ENGLISH11 · USLITPART1 · ENGL4 · ENG10 · ENGLISH2 · ENG11 · ENG14 · ENGL11 · ENG2 · ENGL1A · ENGL14 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you are strong in English, willing to attend, and ready for .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh GraderHeavy Writing LoadPassionate TeacherParticipation MattersBest For Strong Writers
  • and a heavy essay workload.
  • Teaching reviews are split between passionate and helpful versus opinionated and frustrating.
  • Attendance and participation appear important for doing well.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

An A is possible, but students say , and surviving harsh grading.

The single online review is strongly negative about grading, while a few successful hard-working students.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The English content is not always conceptually impossible, but the , and standards make the course challenging.

Online evidence says even intro English felt too demanding, and and high expectations.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Students say attendance and participation matter, and missing or .

Online mentions participation matters, while and attendance prepare students for essays and affect grades.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

43/100

She is recommended by some serious English students but avoided by and heavy writing demands.

The online review does not recommend her, while and strong warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

22/100

Many students call her a and say grades depend on meeting her exact writing expectations.

Format shift

and many in-person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students report , and frequent writing demands.

Format shift

The online review focuses on grading, while workload.

Teaching experience

Average

56/100

Students often praise her passion and help, but many also describe her as opinionated, rude, or hard to learn from.

Format shift

The online review is negative, while and poor teaching experiences.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Comments focus , and participation rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats mainly discuss writing and participation, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mixed, with praise for passion and help but , and participation pressure.

Main concern

Students often feel the grading and workload are harsher than expected.

What students said

“This good student was overwhelmed.”
ENG2
“You earn your A, but it can be done.”
ENG10
“ ”
ENG11

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The only online review says the intro English class was graded too harshly and .

Main concern

.

What students said

“Honestly this class is graded way too hard for being an intro English class.”
ENG10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the final style.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and participation but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book, midterm, or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

The online review does not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You earn your A, but it can be done.”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and participation. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

56/100

“She is clearly passionate about what she teaches and it helps get through the .”

⚖️

22/100

“She grades very hard and she's very close minded!”

📚 Workload Reality

28/100

“ and multiple chapters taken from books.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Course reading is intriguing, always .
  • Carrie is an excellent teacher who truly cares about the subject, knows it well, and wants to help her students.
  • She can be quit rude, or maybe she just comes off that way to me.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Be prepared to work for your grade, and don't expect to do well without attending class.
  • Her class- again- is hard.
  • , If it isn't the exact way she would write it its wrong.

Theme 3

📝 About Workload And Participation

  • This class because she is constantly piling on work and expects you to make this class your number one priority.
  • If because the discussions prepare you for the essays.
  • I received a "D" for participation which brought my grade to a "B".

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Nineteen reviews across many years , and participation, though most reviews are older.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 55
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENG24 reviews
ENG103 reviews
ENG112 reviews
ENGL112 reviews
ENG141 review
Show 7 more courses
ENGL141 review
ENGL1A1 review
ENGL21 review
ENGL41 review
ENGLISH111 review
ENGLISH21 review
USLITPART11 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B 2

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1