AI Rate Professor

Languages

John Burke

ASL001 · ASL1 · M1012 · M5303 · SIGN1 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
77.78%
Difficulty
1.9

The decision

if possible, but be cautious with online sections because communication can be unreliable.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring Sign TeacherLenient GraderParticipation MattersFunny and EngagingOnline Communication Risk
  • and describe him as funny, caring, and effective.
  • Grades are usually easy if students attend, participate, and .
  • Online reviews are split, with serious complaints about communication and hidden grades.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

87/100

Getting an A is usually easy if students attend, participate, and , though it is not a free grade.

Online evidence is mixed but includes an easy A+ review, while and homework lead to an A.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The course content is beginner-friendly overall, but learning through signing only can create an .

Online reviews split between tough logistics and easy content, while as manageable with practice.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Attendance and participation matter, but reviews do not describe a .

and participating, while online reviews do not clearly prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

and , but online communication problems lower confidence.

In-person students are highly enthusiastic, while online students report both strong praise and serious communication issues.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

88/100

Students and grades considerately when homework and participation are completed.

Format shift

, but in-person reviews support it more consistently.

Workload

Light

78/100

The workload is mostly homework, workbook, and participation, with .

Format shift

, while in-person students describe the work as not very difficult.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

In-person teaching is praised as caring and effective, but online communication complaints prevent an excellent overall score.

Format shift

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly positive, while online reviews include major concerns about communication and responsiveness.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

, and trying rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats point more toward assignments and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students mostly describe him as , and easy to pass with steady participation.

Main concern

Students must participate and adjust to learning through signing only.

What students said

“If you show up to class and .”
SIGN1
“Learning another language can be tough, but he was so and allowed us to learn our own personal style.”
ASL1

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and positive review but two serious communication complaints.

Main concern

Poor communication and .

What students said

“He is incredibly inconsistent with communication, including not showing up to any Zoom meetings that he himself scheduled and not responding to emails or texts”
ASL1
“Honestly, you have to try to fail this class, it wasn't hard at all and I learned so much”
ASL001

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, quiz format, midterm format, or final format.

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you show up to class and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and online reliability. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“John is a wonderful teacher. Learning another language can be tough, but he was so and allowed us to learn our own personal style.”

📈 Grade Value

87/100

“If you show up to class and .”

⚠️ Online Risk

55/100

“Grades were hidden so you could not tell if anything was being received.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Fantastic professor, very funny and seems to genuinely care about his students.
  • He makes sure everyone understands.
  • Amazing teacher. Definitely knows how to teach.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • All you have to do is try and .
  • If you show up to class and .
  • He's a , so just do the homework and show that your interested in the class and you will definitely pass!

Theme 3

💻 About Online Experience

  • He is incredibly inconsistent with communication, including not showing up to any Zoom meetings that he himself scheduled and not responding to emails or texts
  • Prof. Burke did not communicate well with other students either
  • Online was tough but Burke made it great.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 11 reviews span several years, include grades, and show a .

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ASL14 reviews
SIGN14 reviews
ASL0011 review
M10121 review
M53031 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 2 · A 7 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1