AI Rate Professor

English

Leslie Henson

ENG000 · ENGLISH11 · ENG6 · ENGENG · ENGLISH119 · ENG04 · ENGLISH10 · ENGAABB · ENGL118 · ENGLISH6 · ENGL003 · ENG118 · ENGL119 · LEAD119 · ENGL2 · ENGL4 · ENG119 · ENGLISH2 · ENG11 · ENGL11 · ENG2 · ENGL6 · 40 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you want serious writing growth and can handle heavy work, frequent participation, and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful FeedbackHeavy WritingClear ExpectationsCaring but DirectParticipation Focused
  • Students often praise Henson for , and helping them improve their writing.
  • The workload is writing-heavy, with , and revisions appearing often.
  • Grading and classroom style are polarizing because some students find her fair and honest while others find her harsh or opinionated.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

64/100

An A is realistic when students show up and complete the writing, but the repeated comments about heavy work and .

Online evidence is more flexible, while , and sustained writing work.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The course content is standard English and writing practice, but the , and critical annotations add challenge.

Online comments mention flexible pacing, while , and revisions.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

Several in-person comments say showing up matters or , while online comments describe more flexibility.

Online evidence suggests flexibility, but and participating.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

and writing growth, though harsh-style complaints create real hesitation.

Online reviews are highly positive but limited, while and more mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

as , but multiple students also call her tough, nitpicky, or hard in the final portfolio.

Format shift

Online comments praise clear criteria, while and tough grading.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and revisions.

Format shift

Both formats mention writing work, but the workload.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Her strongest pattern is helpful feedback and real writing improvement, but some students report .

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is very positive, while but much more polarized.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Assessment appears centered on essays, papers, journals, portfolios, readings, and quizzes rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Online reviews mention writing but , while in-person reviews , and quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

38 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe a helpful but demanding writing , and revisions.

Main concern

The main concern is heavy writing work plus a direct style that some students experience as harsh.

What students said

“there is a lot of work but and get the credit”
ENG118
“She is a but she definitely prepares you for english 2.”
ENGL118
“Easy class, easy assignments. All you have to do is SHOW UP.”
ENG6

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are strongly positive about support and flexibility, but and writing.

Main concern

The main concern is that the workload can feel heavy when combined with other reading and writing classes.

What students said

“there basically no due dates just be prepared to write a little”
ENGL003
“The work load might feel heavy if your other classes require a lot of reading and writing”
ENGL003

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a , but and writing-based assessment.

Quizzes MentionedEssay-Based AssessmentExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and writing portfolios, but they do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, proctoring, midterm, or .

Daily QuizzesStudent-Created QuizzesPortfolio Writing
“ so attendence is mandatory!”
ENG11
“the class creates their own quizes and you write a few essays”
ENG119
“she grades really hard in the end with both portfolio”
ENG119

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you do your part you will do great in the class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 40 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“She helped me grow in my english skills and put confidence that I could do it and I did it.”

📚 Workload Reality

30/100

“Only issue is that the amount of .”

⚖️

48/100

“She is a but she definitely prepares you for english 2.”

👍 Recommendation Value

78/100

“ !!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She makes writing really easy; she walks you through all the steps, one by one.
  • , and .
  • Not a good teacher at all. she attacks one person and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • there is a lot of work but and get the credit
  • If you work hard you will succeed nicely in her class.
  • She grades fairly and prepares you for the next level with comfort and ease.
  • she grades really hard in the end with both portfolio.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support & Personality

  • and genuinely wants/cares to see everyone succeed.
  • if you have learning disability she works with you, Absolutely Great.
  • Take her class if you really want to improve and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

40

Recent reviews read by the AI

40

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 40 reviews across many years, with , and participation despite mixed opinions.

Inside 40 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 517
4 out of 56
3 out of 510
2 out of 54
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENG1195 reviews
ENG114 reviews
ENG24 reviews
ENGLISH64 reviews
ENG1182 reviews
Show 17 more courses
ENGL0032 reviews
ENGL1182 reviews
ENGL22 reviews
ENGLISH1192 reviews
ENG0001 review
ENG041 review
ENG61 review
ENGAABB1 review
ENGENG1 review
ENGL111 review
ENGL1191 review
ENGL41 review
ENGL61 review
ENGLISH101 review
ENGLISH111 review
ENGLISH21 review
LEAD1191 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 3 · A 1

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values