AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Jeanine Neher

USGOV6 · POS12 · POS012 · N1247 · POSPOS · P0S02 · POS02 · POS2 · M6924 · 54 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
37.5%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Take Jeanine Neher only if you want a demanding political science class and can , and lecture-heavy instruction.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy workloadTough graderLecture heavyPolarizing teacherAttendance matters
  • Students consistently describe a heavy workload with lots of reading, papers, lectures, and Canvas assignments.
  • as strict, picky, and unforgiving, even when students work hard.
  • Some students praise her knowledge and neutrality, but many strongly warn against taking the class.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

An A is possible, but students repeatedly say it , and little room for mistakes.

Online reviews make the A feel especially costly, while but still describe hard work.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The political science content is not always described as conceptually hard, but lectures, papers, and .

Online students focus more on disorganization and workload, while , and attendance.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

and showing up are important, and skipping class can hurt performance.

Attendance pressure is clearly supported in in-person reviews, while online .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

Many students strongly warn against the class because the , and communication outweigh the learning value for them.

Online reviews are almost entirely negative, while and strong warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Students often call her a tough or and describe papers, assignments, and presentations as .

Format shift

Online and comments sounding especially frustrated.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Reviews repeatedly mention lots of , and busy work for a basic GE class.

Format shift

Online reviews stress excessive homework, while , and Canvas assignments.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Some students find her knowledgeable and passionate, but many describe her teaching as .

Format shift

Online teaching reviews are mostly negative, while praise and strong criticism.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Reviews mention a mix of , and tests rather than one dominant assessment type.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize homework and papers, while , and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

42 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

but lean difficult, with some students praising her knowledge while many criticize long lectures, heavy work, and .

Main concern

In-person students most often struggle with , and .

What students said

“The and she does not accept late work.”
POS02
“She is a !!!”
POS2
“Very knowledgeable and caring.”
P0S02

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are strongly negative, with students , and weak organization.

Main concern

Online students report , and .

What students said

“She .”
POS012
“Professor Neher is technologically illiterate and requires too much for such a basic GE class”
POS12
“ .”
POS02

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and , but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, webcam use, or Lockdown Browser.

Tests MentionedDifficult TestsExam Policy Unclear

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove whether exams are open-book, closed-book, or proctored.

Difficult TestsTwo Tests Mentioned
“ .”
POS2
“One large paper, one presentation, and course.”
POS12

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam use, or open-book policy.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Prof. Neher does not make it easy, but you can learn a lot from her.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“Prof. Neher does not make it easy, but you can learn a lot from her.”

⚖️

22/100

“She is a !!!”

📚 Workload Pressure

18/100

“The and she does not accept late work.”

👍 Recommendation Risk

34/100

“ but this one!!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very knowledgeable and caring.
  • Her lectures do seem disjointed.
  • The whole class is lecture and she gets off topic super easy.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • If all you want is an easy grade, then she is not for you.
  • She is a !!!
  • I had to work extremely hard to get the grade I got in this class.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • She .
  • The and she does not accept late work.
  • Workload for this class is unbelievable.

Theme 4

❤️ About Student Fit

  • She is a if you are serious about actually learning.
  • I learned a lot from Professor Neher.
  • and you get full credit.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

54

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 50 reviews span many years and show , and polarized teaching quality.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 511
3 out of 52
2 out of 56
1 out of 522

Course coverage

POS221 reviews
POS0217 reviews
M69243 reviews
P0S022 reviews
POS0122 reviews
Show 4 more courses
POS122 reviews
N12471 review
POSPOS1 review
USGOV61 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

32 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 2 · A 7 · A- 1

B range

10

B+ 1 · B 9

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

4

D+ 2 · D 2

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 1