AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Deana Ward

NSG79 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want an engaging nursing instructor who prepares you well and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardAmazing LecturesClear InstructionsCaring FeedbackEnergetic TeachingExam Preparation
  • Students describe Ward as , and very strong at lecture delivery.
  • Both reviewers earned A grades and manageable.
  • The course uses varied learning methods, so it is rewarding rather than effortless.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

74/100

Both reviews report A grades and , but the course still includes exams and .

All because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The nursing material appears meaningful and exam-focused, but .

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

There are no online reviews, and policy.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

95/100

Students strongly recommend Ward because , and useful for exams.

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

76/100

and instructions make assignments easier, but reviews do not suggest free grades.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The class uses exams, videos, projects, books, journal articles, and papers, but .

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Both reviews strongly praise Ward's lectures, clarity, energy, preparation, and care for student work.

Format shift

Teaching evidence is entirely in person.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Reviews mention exams along with projects, books, journal articles, papers, and other learning techniques.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews praise , and strong exam preparation.

Main concern

The course still involves exams and varied assignments, so students need steady effort.

What students said

“She has great lectures, and was always straight to the and really prepared you for exams.”
NSG79
“ so the .”
NSG79
“ and actually reads what you write and cares.”
NSG79

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews say Ward prepares students well for exams, but .

Exam PreparationClear Instructions

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove the exact exam format or rules.

Exam PreparationClear Instructions
“really prepared you for exams.”
NSG79

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She has great lectures, and was always straight to the and really prepared you for exams.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“Great lecture content, very energetic and exciting to listen to.”

👍 Recommendation Value

95/100

“Deana is an amazing teacher. I learned a lot from her.”

⚖️

76/100

“ so the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Deana is an amazing teacher.
  • Great lecture content, very energetic and exciting to listen to.
  • Super fun to be around and very smart woman.

Theme 2

📚 About Learning Methods

  • She uses different techniques to teach (Videos, ).
  • She has great lectures, and was always straight to the and really prepared you for exams.

Theme 3

❤️ And Care

  • and actually reads what you write and cares.
  • so the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

50/100

Evidence confidence

, though both are detailed, recent enough, and highly consistent.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

NSG792 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values