AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Lisa Duke

MATH124 · MATH11 · CALC1 · MATH30 · MATH31 · CALC2 · MATH26 · MATH108 · MATH20 · M7321 · 69 lifetime ratings

AI rating
65/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
55.56%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you can handle steady math practice, but unless you are strong at self-teaching.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTest HeavyLots Of HomeworkOrganized But BoringHelpful In PersonWeak Online Format
  • In-person reviews are much stronger than online reviews, with many students praising organization, help, and .
  • Online Calculus reviews repeatedly describe heavy workload, weak videos, and self-teaching.
  • Getting a good grade is possible, but students usually , and prepare for frequent quizzes and exams.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

An A is realistic for prepared students, but , and exam review rather than minimal effort.

A, while in-person reviews describe a fairer effort-for-reward pattern.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The math content is often challenging and fast-paced, though and repeated practice make it manageable in person.

Online students describe the content as harder to learn independently, while and support make it doable.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

50/100

, but many reviews say students need to show up to pass or do well.

, while online reviews focus more on keeping up with videos, quizzes, and homework.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

practice, but online reviews are strongly negative.

, while online recommendations are mostly avoidant.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

tests, and partial credit, but several reviews still call her a tough grader.

Format shift

, while online reviews mention bad weighting and tougher quiz-test gaps.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Many students report lots of , and multiple exams, especially in Calculus.

Format shift

Online workload is described as especially heavy, while in-person workload is heavy but .

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

She is often described as , and , but also boring, fast, and weak in online delivery.

Format shift

, while online teaching evidence is consistently much weaker.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Reviews repeatedly mention quizzes, tests, study guides, and quiz preparation.

Format shift

Both formats are test-heavy, though online reviews emphasize quizzes and exams as higher-risk because lectures feel insufficient.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

42 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed but often positive, especially for , and use office help.

Main concern

Lectures can feel boring or fast, and skipping class makes success much harder.

What students said

“This class is a lot of work, but if you go to class, do the homework, and do the study guide practice problems, you will get an A, as I did.”
MATH31
“She'll walk you through anything you have a problem with.”
MATH20
“She is very monotone and boring.”
MATH30

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students often describe the class as fast, test-heavy, and poorly supported by lecture videos.

Main concern

Students may need to teach themselves while keeping up with heavy weekly work.

What students said

“ unless you want to teach everything yourself.”
CALC1
“ .”
MATH30
“Her lecture videos are subpar, and do not sufficiently cover the material assigned in the homework.”
MATH30

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews show a quiz-and-exam-heavy structure with some student-friendly supports, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, webcam use, or proctoring rules.

Weekly QuizzesMultiple ExamsCumulative Final ExamPractice ProblemsOptional Final In Some Classes

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention frequent quizzes, tests, practice guides, occasional cheat sheets, and , but do not clearly prove standard closed-book rules.

Weekly QuizzesPractice Test GuidesCheat Sheet In Some ExamsOptional Final In Some Classes
“ and a "cheat sheet" for exams.”
MATH31
“Plus, you might if you're happy with grade you have.”
MATH20
“ .)”
MATH124

Online

, and a cumulative final, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Weekly Homework QuizzesFour ExamsCumulative Final Exam
“There are .”
MATH30
“4 exams and .”
MATH30

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This class is a lot of work, but if you go to class, do the homework, and do the study guide practice problems, you will get an A, as I did.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, grades, and course format. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

68/100

“ and easy to understand.”

👍 Recommendation Split

58/100

“ if you can handle steady math practice, but unless you are strong at self-teaching.”

📚 Workload Reality

35/100

“The weekly work took me at least at least 2 full days to complete.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and easy to understand.
  • She is very monotone and boring.
  • She'll walk you through anything you have a problem with.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Do. The. Homework. and ask for help!
  • .
  • If you aren't a quick learner then expect to do and redo all of your hw.

Theme 3

💻 About Online Format

  • unless you want to teach everything yourself.
  • Her lecture videos are subpar, and do not sufficiently cover the material assigned in the homework.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

69

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 50 reviews span many years, include detailed course experiences, and show a .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 526
4 out of 514
3 out of 58
2 out of 512
1 out of 59

Course coverage

MATH3016 reviews
MATH1249 reviews
MATH1087 reviews
MATH317 reviews
CALC13 reviews
Show 5 more courses
CALC22 reviews
MATH202 reviews
MATH262 reviews
M73211 review
MATH111 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

21 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 3 · A- 1

B range

10

B+ 3 · B 7

C range

5

C+ 3 · C 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1