AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Kimbery Bartsch

MATH26 · MATH018 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
41/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Consider her online class if you can handle long lectures, but be cautious with .

Best fit · Self Taught ProSplit experience by formatHelpful onlineHomework-heavyLecture-heavyStrict in person
  • The online review is positive and describes helpful communication and a and test system.
  • The and describes frustration with explanations and student treatment.
  • With only two reviews, the evidence is thin and highly format-dependent.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

50/100

The online student earned an A, but the in-person student earned a C and .

Online evidence looks more manageable, while the a good grade.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The material is not described as impossible, but long lectures, homework, tests, and .

Online difficulty centers on long lectures, while and tests.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

The in-person review includes a strong attendance warning, while the .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

One student recommends the online class, while the .

Recommendation is positive online and negative in person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

Grades are split between A and C, with .

Format shift

Online grade evidence is positive, while .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

, and the online review also describes long lectures.

Format shift

Both formats mention workload pressure, with online adding long lecture fatigue.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

The online review praises helpfulness and fast email replies, while the and .

Format shift

Teaching experience appears much stronger online than in person.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

75/100

and as test heavy.

Format shift

Both formats mention tests, but only the .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The , frustration with students, heavy homework, and tests.

Main concern

Students may struggle if .

What students said

“ and when she does she gets annoyed/upset for having to repeat herself.”
MATH018
“ .”
MATH018

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online and a and test system despite long lectures.

Main concern

Lectures can run long and become mentally tiring.

What students said

“But otherwise great system for homework and email asap.”
MATH-26
“The lectures are sometimes a little bit too long.”
MATH-26

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, book policy, or .

Tests MentionedExam Policy Not Clearly Proved

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , but does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, or book policy.

Test HeavyExam Policy Not Clearly Proved
“Test heavy”
MATH018

Online

The online review mentions tests, but does .

Tests MentionedExam Policy Not Clearly Proved
“great system for homework and tests”
MATH-26

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“But otherwise great system for homework and email asap.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting the strong split between online and in-person experiences. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“ .”

👍 Recommendation Split

50/100

“ .”

⚠️ In-Person Concern

35/100

“ .”

Theme 1

💻 About Online Class

  • The lectures are sometimes a little bit too long.
  • great system for homework and tests
  • .

Theme 2

🏫 About In-Person Class

  • she gets annoyed/upset for having to repeat herself
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews exist, and they sharply disagree across formats, so conclusions should be treated cautiously.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH-261 review
MATH0181 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values