AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Suzanne Hilderbrand

POS2 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Consider her only if and are comfortable with a politically strong classroom tone.

Best fit · Effort For RewardStrict gradingPolitically opinionatedClear to some studentsAll-or-nothing assignmentsLow evidence base
  • One student found her engaging and easy to understand.
  • One student strongly criticized rigid assignment rules and .
  • The evidence is thin, so confidence is limited.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Getting an A looks risky because one review describes strict zero-credit rules for small assignment mistakes.

online reviews to compare.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The material may be understandable, but and .

Only in-person evidence exists, and it is split between easy-to-digest lectures and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

A review tag says skipping class hurts passing, and participation appears to matter.

; there is no online attendance evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Recommendation depends heavily on whether a and a strongly liberal perspective.

The , and there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

One review describes zeroes and required redos for small formatting or wording issues.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

The workload is not described as huge, but .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload, and the evidence is limited.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

and a frustrating classroom experience.

Format shift

and one negative review.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

, and test-heavy tagging, so assessment appears mixed but uncertain.

Format shift

Only in-person comments provide assessment evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are split between engaging teaching and .

Main concern

for formatting or wording mistakes.

What students said

“She coveys her information in a way that I found easy to digest.”
POS2
“ as she said or youd get a ZERO and have to redo it.”
POS2

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Test Heavy MentionedExam Format Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but they do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Test Heavy Mentioned
“Test heavy”
POS2

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ as she said or youd get a ZERO and have to redo it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“She can be funny and engaging.”

⚖️

20/100

“Its very all or as the semester goes on.”

👍 Recommendation Level

45/100

“I really enjoyed her.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She coveys her information in a way that I found easy to digest.
  • She can be funny and engaging.

Theme 2

⚖️

  • as she said or youd get a ZERO and have to redo it.
  • Its very all or as the semester goes on.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only 2 reviews are available, and they sharply disagree, so conclusions are tentative.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

POS22 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1