AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Susan Raven

MATH124 · M5760 · MATH11 · MATH · MATH214 · C3412 · MATH18 · MATH108 · MATH216 · INTALGEBRA · TRIGMATH20 · MATH108124 · ALG101 · MATH20 · MATH217 · 46 lifetime ratings

AI rating
98/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
92.31%
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

if you struggle with math and , and strong encouragement.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyPatient math coachBeginner friendlyCaring and accessibleLenient gradingFunny lectures
  • Students consistently say Susan Raven makes math less stressful and easier to understand.
  • Grades are very forgiving through easy tests, , late-work flexibility, and strong support.
  • The only major warning is that the single online review describes little instruction and heavy self-teaching.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

Getting an A is very realistic because , and strong help, though students still need to do practice work.

The Easy A evidence is almost entirely from in-person reviews, while the single online review reports a .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

The math content can be intimidating, but students say she breaks it down slowly, clearly, and in multiple ways.

In-person students describe the course as manageable and beginner-friendly, while the online student found it difficult due to limited instruction.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

86/100

as not counted against the grade and absences are handled flexibly, but missing class can still hurt understanding.

Attendance flexibility is supported by in-person comments, while the online .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Students strongly recommend her because , and unusually effective for math-anxious students.

, while the single online review recommends taking her only in person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

91/100

Reviews repeatedly mention , easy , and confidence-boosting grading.

Format shift

Lenient grading evidence comes from in-person reviews, while the .

Workload

Light

72/100

Workload is usually manageable, though several reviews mention lots of .

Format shift

In-person workload is described as manageable with useful practice, while the and unit tests.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students consistently describe her as , and especially strong for people who struggle with math.

Format shift

In-person teaching evidence is excellent and consistent, while the only online review says there were and not much instruction.

Assessment method

Balanced

64/100

Assessment appears to combine homework or practice with quizzes, unit tests, and .

Format shift

Online evidence mentions weekly quizzes and unit tests, while in-person reviews mention homework, practice problems, tests, review sessions, and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

45 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly positive, highlighting clear explanations, patience, humor, flexibility, and .

Main concern

Some students mention move fast.

What students said

“She makes sure no one is left behind, will explain things in multiple ways to appeal to various learning styles and .”
MATH108
“ the review session, so go to the review sessions.”
MATH124
“ as part of the grade, but if you miss that is your fault if you don't understand what is going on.”
MATH108

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review is negative because the class had little instruction and required self-teaching from the book.

Main concern

Online students may need to teach themselves without regular lectures.

What students said

“I had to from a book and math isnt my thing.”
MATH18
“ .”
MATH18

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe tests and exams as manageable and closely tied to review material, but they .

Weekly QuizzesUnit TestsReview-Based ExamsExtra Credit On TestsEasy Tests Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

74/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews say tests are easy, reviewed closely beforehand, and include , but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, midterm, final, or proctoring rules.

Review-Based ExamsExtra Credit On TestsEasy Tests Mentioned
“ the review session, so go to the review sessions.”
MATH124
“ and are exactly the material you practiced.”
MATH124
“ .”
MATH124

Online

The online review mentions chapter or weekly quizzes and unit tests, but does not clearly prove proctoring, .

Weekly QuizzesUnit Tests
“ . Unit tests.”
MATH18

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you are apprehensive about math take this teacher. She gives you every opportunity to pass and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 46 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and student support; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“She makes sure no one is left behind, will explain things in multiple ways to appeal to various learning styles and .”

👍 Recommendation Strength

96/100

“ .”

⚖️

91/100

“Grades in a way that boosts confidence; if only part of the problem is wrong credit is given for what is done correctly”

💻 Online Caution

35/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She can show you how to solve the problems in several ways until you understand it.
  • She went slow and explained everything.
  • She made everything easy and fun.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She gives you every opportunity to pass and .
  • .
  • She allows and .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She really cares about your success and does whatever she can to ensure that you understand the content.
  • She is extremely funny and makes learning fun.
  • and understanding.

Theme 4

💻 About Online Experience

  • I had to from a book and math isnt my thing.
  • She was hard to get ahold of, not much instruction, and gave .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

46

Recent reviews read by the AI

46

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 46 reviews across many years with and one clearly negative online outlier.

Inside 46 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 539
4 out of 55
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH10813 reviews
MATH1249 reviews
MATH1081244 reviews
MATH183 reviews
MATH203 reviews
Show 12 more courses
MATH2173 reviews
1081 review
34121 review
ALG1011 review
C34121 review
INTALGEBRA1 review
M57601 review
MATH1 review
MATH111 review
MATH2141 review
MATH2161 review
TRIGMATH201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

15

A+ 5 · A 9 · A- 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values