AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Bettye-Ann Stephens

CDF56 · CDF30 · ECE44 · CDF34 · CDEV100 · CDF65 · ECE10 · ECE3 · CDF806468 · CDF58 · CDF44 · CDF66 · CDF80 · CDF59 · CDF77 · CDF18 · CDF14 · 39 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
1.8

The decision

Take Bettye-Ann Stephens if you can attend consistently and like discussion-heavy classes, but avoid her if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardStrict attendanceEasy grades with participationStory-based teachingCaring but polarizingFew traditional tests
  • Most students describe her classes as easy to pass if you attend, participate, and follow directions.
  • Teaching is highly story-based and energetic, which many students love but .
  • because multiple reviews say missing too many classes can hurt or end your grade.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Getting an A is usually easy if you attend, participate, and complete the work, but absences can quickly damage the grade.

The Easy A evidence is almost entirely from in-person reviews, while the single online review .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

The content is usually not academically overwhelming because she relies on stories, discussion, and limited testing, though .

, while the online review says the material was hard to handle without teaching support.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

as strict, with students warned they may fail or be dropped after missing too many classes.

Strict attendance evidence comes from in-person reviews; the online review only mentions participation, not a .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

, and easy, but several serious complaints mention unclear teaching, favoritism, or poor online support.

, while the only online review is clearly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Grades are generally lenient when students attend and participate, but .

Format shift

Lenient grading evidence is mainly from in-person reviews, while the .

Workload

Moderate

62/100

, but several also mention lots of journals, group work, and outside-class work.

Format shift

In-person workload varies by course, while the online review specifically reports lots of homework.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Many students praise her energy, care, and experience-based teaching, but a .

Format shift

but polarizing, while the only online review says she did not teach enough.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Assessment appears driven more by attendance, participation, journals, group work, presentations, and .

Format shift

and participation-based assessment, while the online review only mentions posted assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

38 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, lively stories, and strong support balanced by strict attendance and occasional unclear expectations.

Main concern

Attendance and participation are often treated as essential parts of the grade.

What students said

“As long as you attend class and participate, you will get a good grade.”
CDF14
“Show up to class, participate in , and you will have no problem getting an A.”
CDF58
“She only allows for two absences from class.”
CDF14

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review is negative and .

Main concern

Students may need to figure out material and .

What students said

“Doesnt teach anything I had lots of trouble in both of her classes would ask her for help”
CDF65

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In-person reviews repeatedly describe no traditional tests or .

No TestsTake-Home TestsNo TextbookFinal Potluck

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

86/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe no traditional tests in many classes, with and a .

No TestsTake-Home TestsFinal Potluck
“There are .”
CDF14
“ ”
CDF14
“all the and !”
CDF14

Online

Online reviews do .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“As long as you attend class and participate, you will get a good grade.”

Voice snapshots generated from 39 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“She teaches her classes well, and asks lots of questions so you can figure out the answer for yourself.”

📈 Easy Grade Path

84/100

“It is easy to get an A. Attend class and do the work.”

⚠️

18/100

“Must attend or ”

👍 Recommendation Level

70/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She tells stories and makes it very interesting.
  • stories.
  • Doesnt teach anything I had lots of trouble in both of her classes would ask her for help

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • If you want an easy A, .
  • Show up to class, participate in , and you will have no problem getting an A.
  • ! but don't let that fool you, you will have to do a lot of work outside class.

Theme 3

🕒

  • She only allows for two absences from class.
  • BUT DO NOT MISS MORE THAN TWO !!
  • Some students flunked out because they didn't realize how many days they had missed.

Theme 4

❤️ About Character

  • and supportive.
  • She cares about every student that walks through her classroom door.
  • She can be very rude at times.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

39

Recent reviews read by the AI

39

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 39 reviews span many years and , and story-based teaching despite some mixed opinions.

Inside 39 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 522
4 out of 59
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CDF1412 reviews
CDF585 reviews
CDF593 reviews
CDF653 reviews
CDF8064683 reviews
Show 12 more courses
CDF562 reviews
CDEV1001 review
CDF181 review
CDF301 review
CDF341 review
CDF441 review
CDF661 review
CDF771 review
CDF801 review
ECE101 review
ECE31 review
ECE441 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 1 · A 8

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1