AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Terri Hutton

CDF44 · CDF2 · CDF40 · CDF014 · CDF48 · CDF48ONLINE · CDF63 · CDF96D · CDF41 · CDF14 · 48 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
53.33%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you are highly self-directed and committed to child development, because many students describe the class as confusing and frustrating.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing DirectionsTough GraderDisorganized Course DesignCaring When EngagedHeavy Workload
  • Students repeatedly , and disorganized online systems.
  • Positive reviews , and useful for committed child development students.
  • Getting a strong grade is possible, but students often describe the process as frustrating and unclear.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

A is possible, but many , and grade disputes that raise the effort cost.

Online evidence is harsher on grading and confusion, while easy-grader reports.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The subject matter is not always described as hard, but and disorganization make the course feel harder than it should.

and prompts, while in-person reviews split between straightforward content and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews mention participation matters and showing up helps, but they do not clearly prove a .

Both formats provide limited direct attendance evidence, with in-person comments more often stressing class participation.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

36/100

Many students strongly warn against taking her because of , and poor communication despite some passionate positive reviews.

Online reviews are mostly avoidant, while and include stronger praise from committed students.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

26/100

Students repeatedly call her a tough or harsh grader and .

Format shift

Online reviews are especially critical of grading, while and harsh-grading complaints.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Students describe lots of homework, online discussions, projects, labs, busy work, and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention discussions, projects, and multiple platforms, while , and excessive assignments.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Her passion and caring come through in positive reviews, but the , and inconsistent communication.

Format shift

Online teaching is rated much worse because students report self-teaching and slow replies, while and support.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Reviews mention , and group work rather than one single assessment type.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize quizzes, tests, discussions, and projects, while , and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

32 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mixed, with some students praising her passion and support while , and heavy work.

Main concern

The class can feel disorganized and is engaged.

What students said

“I spent more time in this class trying to decipher poorly worded or .”
CDF014
“Terri obviously knows what she's talking about.”
CDF44
“I enjoyed this class!”
CDF14

Remote format

Online

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, with repeated complaints about unclear instructions, poor communication, tough grading, and .

Main concern

Students often feel they must teach themselves and chase clarification.

What students said

“This instructor is extremely difficult to follow.”
CDF014
“Enjoy teaching the class to yourself!”
CDF14
“I would just have to say .”
CDF014

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is mixed, with some student-friendly open-book or take-home comments but .

Opinion-Based TestsConfusing ExamsTake-Home ExamsOpen-Book TestsPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and open-book tests, but other students still describe exams as confusing.

Take-Home ExamsOpen-Book TestsConfusing Exams
“5 online written assignments. 2 take home exams.”
CDF44
“In cdf48 .”
CDF14
“she allows you to use your book on the tests.”
CDF14

Online

Online reviews mention tests and , but they do not clearly prove webcam rules, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book status.

Opinion-Based TestsDuplicate QuestionsPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“She made the tests herself and had many grammar and punctuation mistakes in them.”
CDF014
“ .”
CDF14

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I spent more time in this class trying to decipher poorly worded or .”

Voice snapshots generated from 48 reviews, highlighting repeated themes in , and communication. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“This instructor is extremely difficult to follow.”

👍 Recommendation Risk

36/100

“ .”

⚖️

26/100

“She .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Terri obviously knows what she's talking about.
  • She's a , and her class is pretty straightforward.
  • and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She is a but gives you opportunities to get a better grade.
  • Test and HW are easy if you pay attention.
  • Work hard, and you will receive what you are due.

Theme 3

💬 About Communication

  • It takes her a little while sometimes to get back to you, so make sure and as soon as possible!
  • I emailed her and it took weeks for her to get back to me.
  • She gets back to my emails in the same day, almost the same hour!

Theme 4

📚 About Workload

  • Lots of online discussions, as well as projects.
  • There is far too much work in this class.
  • This is especially unfortunate because this class has an excessive amount of and few meaningful ones.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

48

Recent reviews read by the AI

48

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 48 reviews span many years, include both formats, and show consistent themes across detailed comments.

Inside 48 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 59
3 out of 53
2 out of 58
1 out of 518

Course coverage

CDF1425 reviews
CDF0147 reviews
CDF445 reviews
CDF484 reviews
CDF632 reviews
Show 5 more courses
CDF21 review
CDF401 review
CDF411 review
CDF48ONLINE1 review
CDF96D1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 1 · A 7 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Fail 1 · Not sure yet 2