AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Stacey Burks

PHIL6C3534 · LOGIC · LOGICPHIL · PHIL2 · LOGIC6T · PHIL6 · PHIL006 · PHIL1 · PHIL101 · LOGIC6 · PHIL106 · 116 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
58.82%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

if you want a demanding logic or philosophy course and can handle strict expectations, heavy practice, and a polarizing teaching style.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerExtremely HardAttendance RequiredTest HeavyPolarizing LecturerTough Grader
  • Students consistently describe the course as very hard and not an easy A.
  • , and asking questions are repeatedly framed as necessary to pass.
  • Reviews are sharply split between students who learned a lot and students .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Students say A grades are possible, but only with , and persistence in a tough class.

Online evidence is limited and mixed, while easy A.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

Logic and philosophy content is repeatedly described as abstract, fast, and extremely difficult.

Both formats report difficulty, but the and more consistent.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

Many students say missing class leads to being lost or failing, and one review says the .

Online reviews mention participation but not strict attendance, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

, while many others warn strongly against taking her.

Online reviews are split, and in-person reviews are highly polarized with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Some reviews mention curves or wiggle room, but , and grades that must be earned.

Format shift

Online evidence includes one tough-grader tag, while and occasional curves.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students frequently mention daily homework, lots of practice, required reading, and major study time.

Format shift

Online evidence is sparse, while and practice demands.

Teaching experience

Average

45/100

She is praised as knowledgeable and sometimes helpful, but many students describe her as .

Format shift

Online reviews are split, and much higher volume.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

85/100

Grades are repeatedly described as , and a .

Format shift

Online reviews do not clearly describe assessment structure, while and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

48 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews repeatedly describe a and a polarizing instructor.

Main concern

The , and unforgiving if students miss class or fall behind.

What students said

“Want an easy A? Go somewhere else!”
PHIL6
“Don't miss a single class or you will be LOST.”
PHIL6
“ and a final.”
PHIL6

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

availability and one student saying explanations were inconsistent.

Main concern

Online students may need to resolve confusion independently if .

What students said

“She was willing to work through any problems I or anyone else had in the class.”
PHIL6
“ and she does a horrible job at answering questions.”
PHIL6

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews clearly describe hard quizzes and tests, but they do not clearly prove open-book status, closed-book rules, proctoring, or Lockdown Browser use.

Tough TestsQuiz HeavyMidterm And FinalExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a final, but do not clearly prove proctoring or open-book rules.

Tough TestsQuiz HeavyMidterm And Final
“ and a final.”
PHIL6
“ so .”
PHIL6
“ is too hard understand.”
PHIL006

Online

Online reviews do not clearly .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Want an easy A? Go somewhere else!”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“She is a tough teacher teaching a tough subject.”

📚 Course Difficulty

25/100

“Easily the hardest class I've ever taken.”

⚖️

32/100

“Grades are earned, not given, and this class is a perfect example of that.”

👍 Recommendation Level

45/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Stacey's an amazing lecturer for such a tricky subject.
  • She is not specific and gives attitude when you ask for clarity.
  • She is very knowledgeable about Logic and you can learn a lot if you show up to every class and do the homework.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Want an easy A? Go somewhere else!
  • I've never worked so hard for a C in my life!
  • Not an easy 'A' class; must work hard to earn grade.

Theme 3

🚪 And Rules

  • Don't miss a single class or you will be LOST.
  • and doesn't allow entry, even if you are walking in 20 seconds after start time.
  • Make sure you attend class or you will NOT learn!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

116

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

The profile has 50 reviews across many years, rich details, and consistent themes of , and polarized teaching.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 540
4 out of 516
3 out of 57
2 out of 519
1 out of 534

Course coverage

PHIL635 reviews
LOGIC62 reviews
LOGICPHIL2 reviews
PHIL0062 reviews
PHIL1062 reviews
Show 7 more courses
69051 review
LOGIC1 review
LOGIC6T1 review
PHIL11 review
PHIL1011 review
PHIL21 review
PHIL6C35341 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

21 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 4

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 4

C range

5

C+ 1 · C 4

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Fail 1 · Not sure yet 4