AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Dijana Fazlic

ACCT201 · ACCT2602 · ACCT20 · ACCT002 · ACCT01 · ACCT202 · M3733 · 24 lifetime ratings

AI rating
4/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

unless you can teach yourself accounting and handle heavy work with .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized lecturesHarsh gradingHeavy homeworkPoor communicationSelf-teaching required
  • and weak responses to questions.
  • Homework and , and often poorly aligned with lectures.
  • A few students say , but the overall advice is strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

25/100

Getting an A appears to , and surviving harsh or .

Both formats require heavy independent work, while online reviews stress harsh grading and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Accounting content , and assignments due before students feel taught.

Online comments cite self-teaching, while and pacing.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Tags and comments suggest skipping class hurts performance, though .

Online and in-person evidence both suggests attendance or engagement matters, but .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Most students explicitly because , and organization are poor.

Both online and in-person students give strongly negative recommendations.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Students repeatedly call her a and , and low grades.

Format shift

Online reviews explicitly mention no curve and , while and failed outcomes.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Reviews often mention lots of , and assignments before instruction.

Format shift

Online reviews mention big projects and lots of homework, while and unclear schedules.

Teaching experience

Awful

14/100

Most comments describe disorganization, unclear lectures, poor communication, impatience, and a need to teach yourself.

Format shift

Online reviews focus on poor communication and self-learning, while , and lack of preparation.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Students mention and .

Format shift

and tests, but neither gives a .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are also highly negative, with repeated complaints , and poor support.

Main concern

, and overloaded.

What students said

“The complete.”
ACCT202
“ if this is ur first time taking accounting.”
ACCT20

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are very negative, , and self-teaching.

Main concern

Students say help is hard to get and .

What students said

“The class lacked organization, had sub par teaching, abysmal communication in every facet, and on top of that she grades harshly and if the mean score is a sub 60%.”
ACCT002
“She expects you to learn everything by yourself which is not how it should be.”
ACCT2602

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews clearly describe difficult tests and , but they do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book, webcam, or closed-book policies.

Tough TestsNo Curve MentionedUnclear Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Standard

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and midterms, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or proctoring policies.

Tough TestsQuizzesMidterms
“Tough class and a .”
ACCT20
“Makes mistakes during lecture and even midterms.”
ACCT202

Online

and , but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Tough TestsNo Curve Mentioned
“she grades harshly and if the mean score is a sub 60%.”
ACCT002

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“DO NOT TAKE HER! . She is terrible at lectures and when you ask for help she won't answer the questions.”

Voice snapshots generated from 24 reviews, highlighting repeated themes in , and support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

14/100

“She was unprepared for every class.”

⚖️

12/100

“she grades harshly and if the mean score is a sub 60%.”

📚 Workload Pressure

18/100

“The complete.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She makes the .
  • Lectures are too fast for anyone to keep up with.
  • Most learning is on your own.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • ! hard to understand.
  • Expect .

Theme 3

🚩 About Support and Communication

  • She doesnt care about her students.
  • When asked questions, she was unable to answer completely.
  • She was hard to work with and she gets mad if .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

24

Recent reviews read by the AI

24

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The judgment is based on 24 reviews across several years with consistent, detailed , and support.

Inside 24 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 56
3 out of 50
2 out of 54
1 out of 514

Course coverage

ACCT207 reviews
ACCT2027 reviews
ACCT2015 reviews
ACCT012 reviews
ACCT0021 review
Show 2 more courses
ACCT26021 review
M37331 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

4

Fail 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1