AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Beth Cannon

MATH18 · MATH124 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
19/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you can handle a strict math class with and uneven student support.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderTest heavyMixed teachingLow flexibilityHeavy homework
  • Two of three reviews are and compassion.
  • One review says she teaches well, gives good examples, and .
  • The biggest risk is a grade.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

An A is not supported by the comments, and , and a final worth 70%.

All evidence is treated as in-person, and there is no online review evidence.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Math content is described as hard for some students, especially when material is condensed and test-heavy.

Only in-person evidence exists, including one review that and two that stress difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

35/100

, but comments suggest low flexibility during disruptions.

The available in-person reviews discuss flexibility and compassion, not a .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

33/100

Recommendation is weak because two students would not take her again despite one praising her teaching.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

22/100

, and a final worth 70% of the grade.

Format shift

, and they lean strict.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Tags and comments mention lots of , and condensed material.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

One student praises her examples and patience, but two reviews describe poor support, low compassion, and damaging pacing.

Format shift

All teaching evidence is in-person and sharply mixed.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Students describe the course as test-heavy and say the final can be 70% of the grade.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss assessment, and they emphasize exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

but leans negative, with one strong teaching review and two complaints about harshness and .

Main concern

and limited flexibility can make the class risky.

What students said

“She is great at teaching a class.”
MATH18
“you fail the final which is 70% of your grade”
MATH124

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The because comments describe a test-heavy class and a final worth 70%, but .

Test HeavyHigh-Stakes FinalUnclear Proctoring Policy

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

final worth 70%, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or proctoring.

Test HeavyHigh-Stakes Final
“you fail the final which is 70% of your grade”
MATH124
“ ”
MATH124

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She gives good examples and lectures. If you still don't get it, she really .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 and repeated grading concerns. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“She is great at teaching a class.”

⚖️

22/100

“you fail the final which is 70% of your grade”

👍 Recommendation Rate

33/100

“After taking around 20 classes at Butte College I can say with a great degree of confidence that this is the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is great at teaching a class.
  • She gives good examples and lectures.
  • If you still don't get it, she really .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Lots of homework
  • Graded by few things
  • you fail the final which is 70% of your grade

Theme 3

🚩 About Support and Flexibility

  • During the power outages and blackouts expect zero compassion or willingness to work with you.
  • Heartless
  • I felt like there was a lot of favoritism involved

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

, but they include specific details and a and two negative experiences.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH182 reviews
MATH1241 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values