AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Wei-Ming Wu

PHIL5 · C6895 · LOGIC1 · PHIL00 · PHIL05 · C6898 · PHIL6 · PHIL005 · PHIL006 · PHIL18 · LOGIC6 · LOG1 · INTROTOLOGIC · PHIL16 · 132 lifetime ratings

AI rating
20/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
31.25%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Avoid unless you , and a polarizing lecture style.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderLecture HeavyHard to UnderstandTest HeavyPassionate but Polarizing
  • , and frequent off-topic tangents.
  • Grades and tests are often described as , and difficult despite some .
  • A smaller group values his knowledge, compassion, and thought-provoking perspective.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting an A appears possible with attendance, , and steady work, but many students say tests and .

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The content , and limited alignment between study materials and exams.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

as important for passing or , and skipping class is presented as risky.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Most students do not recommend him because they found the , and support limited.

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

22/100

Students repeatedly call him a and describe tests, papers, and discussions as hard to score well on.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Students report lots of reading, papers, online work, discussions, and test preparation, though a few say the workload is manageable.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

He is often described as knowledgeable and passionate, but many students , and hard to understand.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

76/100

Assessments appear heavily test-based, with , and also affecting grades.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are highly polarized but lean negative, with , and tough tests.

Main concern

Students often say they had to self-teach because .

What students said

“Impossible, doesn't matter how hard you try”
PHIL18
“You will be confused all semester, with no clarity from him.”
PHIL006
“It really is a great class without too much difficulty.”
PHIL18

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and limited study guidance, with one in-person review saying notes were allowed.

Tough TestsNo Study GuidesOpen Notes MentionedTests May Not Match Study Guides

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and , while one review says notes were allowed.

Tough TestsNo Study GuidesOpen Notes MentionedTests May Not Match Study Guides
“There were 3 test throughout the semester and were extremely difficult.”
PHIL05
“ ”
PHIL18
“ though we get to use our notes).”
PHIL18

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You will be confused all semester, with no clarity from him.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation strength; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“He cannot speak clear English, Goes off topic A ”

⚖️

22/100

“ but as long as you do the work and turn it in on time you should pass.”

👍 Recommendation Level

32/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures are really long and he doesn't post them online or .
  • He is nearly impossible to understand.
  • His lectures were very interesting even though he went off topic a lot of the time.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Impossible, doesn't matter how hard you try
  • I am a straight A student and , but his makes up for it and it is still possible to get an A.
  • The class is difficult, and though we get to use our notes).

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • and smart.
  • .
  • Teacher cares about his students and will make every effort to help if requested.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

132

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is based on 50 in-person reviews over many years with , and polarization.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 524
4 out of 515
3 out of 519
2 out of 530
1 out of 544

Course coverage

PHIL1821 reviews
PHIL0067 reviews
PHIL56 reviews
PHIL64 reviews
INTROTOLOGIC2 reviews
Show 9 more courses
PHIL052 reviews
C68951 review
C68981 review
LOG11 review
LOGIC11 review
LOGIC61 review
PHIL001 review
PHIL0051 review
PHIL161 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

21 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 3 · A- 2

B range

5

B+ 3 · B 2

C range

5

C+ 1 · C 3 · C- 1

D range

3

D+ 1 · D 1 · D- 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1