AI Rate Professor

English

Kelly Candelaria

ENGL002 · ENGLI119 · ENGL23 · ENGL1B · ENG18 · ENGL2 · ENGLISH119 · ENGL4 · ENG119 · ENGLISH2 · ENGL119 · ENG2 · ENG23 · 27 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you want a and are willing to keep up with reading, writing, and participation.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring ProfessorHelpful FeedbackLots of ReadingWriting HeavyParticipation Matters
  • Students consistently describe her as caring, helpful, and .
  • The class is not effortless because , and participation.
  • Grades are usually fair and achievable for students who keep up with the work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

Grades are very attainable with , and revision, but and writing work.

The online review says grading is vague but not harsh, while in-person reviews .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

The concepts are usually accessible, but the amount of , and .

Online evidence is limited to one review, while but work-heavy courses.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

Participation and , but flexibility appears to vary by course and situation.

The online review mentions participation, while and participation affecting grades.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Students overwhelmingly recommend her because , and .

Both formats are positive, but the because it has 26 reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

She is usually fair, gives feedback, and sometimes offers multiple chances, though deadlines.

Format shift

Online evidence says she is not tough but vague, while improve.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Students often mention lots of reading, essays, projects, and end-of-semester work.

Format shift

Both formats mention reading or evidence.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Most students describe her as , and engaging, despite a few older severe negative reviews.

Format shift

Online evidence is limited, while in-person reviews strongly support a positive teaching experience.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Grades appear driven mainly by essays, papers, projects, bibliography work, participation, and presentations rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats point toward .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and clarity, while warning that reading, essays, and participation matter.

Main concern

, and participation demands.

What students said

“Kelly wants to see her students succeed and is very willing to help her students get an A.”
ENGL4
“There is quite a bit of work but as long as you just do it then this class is pretty much an easy A.”
ENGL2
“No textbook, but lots of articles and books.”
ENGL002

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single online review says the class was manageable but and unusual movie analysis.

Main concern

.

What students said

“Super vague in but not a .”
ENGL1B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize writing assignments and presentations, and they do not clearly prove a .

EssaysPapersPresentationsExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a presentation, but they do not clearly prove a .

EssaysProjectsFinal Presentation
“Wrote 3 essays in all”
ENG119
“She does make you do a 5min presentation for the final”
ENG119

Online

The online review mentions essays and choice of books or movies, but it .

EssaysChoice-Based Topics
“there's a given number of essays and you get to choose which books/movies you write them on throughout the semester”
ENGL1B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Kelly wants to see her students succeed and is very willing to help her students get an A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 27 , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“She cares about her students and wants them to learn.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

90/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Reality

48/100

“There is quite a bit of work but as long as you just do it then this class is pretty much an easy A.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She cares about her students and wants them to learn.
  • Kelly is an incredible professor. I loved her so much.
  • great teacher! she really breaks things down and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Kelly wants to see her students succeed and is very willing to help her students get an A.
  • She's basically an easy B but to get an A you really gotta push.
  • Super vague in but not a .

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • No textbook, but lots of articles and books.
  • There is a lot of readings and a few papers but they are not difficult
  • She does a lot of BIG PROJECTS.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

27

Recent reviews read by the AI

27

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-seven reviews across many years provide rich, consistent evidence, though the single online review limits online confidence.

Inside 27 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 515
4 out of 57
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG27 reviews
ENGL24 reviews
ENGL0023 reviews
ENGL43 reviews
ENG1192 reviews
Show 8 more courses
ENG181 review
ENG231 review
ENGL1191 review
ENGL1B1 review
ENGL231 review
ENGLI1191 review
ENGLISH1191 review
ENGLISH21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 2 · A 8

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1