AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Linda Belmonte

ACCT2 · ACCT020 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
25/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

if you are new to accounting or need slow, structured instruction.

Best fit · Self Taught ProFast LecturesLots of HomeworkDeveloping TeacherAccounting KnowledgeNot Beginner Friendly
  • Students say she knows accounting but is still developing as a teacher.
  • Lectures can be chaotic, fast, and hard for beginners to follow.
  • and time consuming.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

One student earned an A-, but reviews describe high difficulty and , so the grade is not easy.

All .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The course feels difficult because lectures are fast, chaotic, and not beginner friendly.

Only in-person evidence exists, so no format difference can be judged.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The reviews .

Only in-person evidence exists, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Both students would not take her again, mainly due to teaching clarity and workload concerns.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

, but the course is difficult and homework-heavy.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students report consuming.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

She has subject knowledge, but fast, chaotic lectures make the learning experience weak.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

The comments emphasize homework assignments and projects more than exams.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

but uneven teacher with fast lectures and .

Main concern

Beginners may struggle with and .

What students said

“her lectures are a bit chaotic; she writes and talks extremely fast”
ACCT020
“She has two homework assignments due a week(usually time consuming).”
ACCT2

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove any exam format, .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The policy.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“All in all, I would not recommend this for someone new to accounting.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching clarity and workload. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“her lectures are a bit chaotic; she writes and talks extremely fast”

📚 Workload

25/100

“She has two homework assignments due a week(usually time consuming).”

👍 Recommendation Level

22/100

“All in all, I would not recommend this for someone new to accounting.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • her lectures are a bit chaotic; she writes and talks extremely fast
  • She has a great knowledge of the subject and I think is still developing as a teacher.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Workload

  • The textbook (Accounting, 6th Edition by Peter Eisen) is very unhelpful imo.
  • She has two homework assignments due a week(usually time consuming).

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews are available, but , and teaching clarity issues.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ACCT0201 review
ACCT21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values