AI Rate Professor

Physical Ed

Frances Babich

ENGENG2 · PE118 · KIN047 · HEALT2 · PE18A · HLTH2 · PE17 · PE · INTROTOSPORTMED · INTROSPTSMED · PE74A · PE7 · 24 lifetime ratings

AI rating
66/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

, but be cautious with Health because workload and quiz wording can feel frustrating.

Best fit · Effort For RewardFunny and engaging in personEasy A with follow-throughHeavy online workloadAmbiguous quizzesMixed helpfulness
  • In-person PE and stress management reviews are mostly warm and positive.
  • Health and online-style reviews repeatedly mention heavy recurring work and tricky quizzes.
  • Grades can be good, but students often need steady effort and organization.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Many students say an A is reachable by doing the work, but , and steady pressure.

Online evidence is divided, while in-person evidence is easier in PE classes but heavier in Health.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

The material is usually manageable, but Health workload and Sport Medicine expectations make some sections feel more demanding.

Online comments stress workload and quiz wording, while in-person PE comments describe approachable and practical classes.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

as strictly mandatory, but comments emphasize showing up, participating, and keeping pace.

Online evidence focuses on deadlines, while in-person evidence suggests attendance helps with participation and class experience.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

Students often recommend her for engaging PE and stress-management classes, but Health reviews create real caution.

In-person reviews are more favorable overall, while online reviews are too split to give a .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Grading can be forgiving when work is completed, but .

Format shift

Online reviews conflict sharply, while in-person reviews show easier grading in PE and more complaints in Health.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Work is often easy but can be frequent, especially in Health sections with daily or weekly assignments.

Format shift

and work, while in-person PE evidence suggests a lighter class rhythm.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Many students describe her as funny, wise, helpful, and engaging, though some Health students report poor support.

Format shift

In-person PE and stress-management reviews are strongest, while online and Health-related reviews are less consistent.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and practical class participation rather than one dominant method.

Format shift

and quizzes, while in-person evidence includes participation, practical demonstrations, and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

22 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed but often praise her humor, energy, and approachable style in PE-oriented classes.

Main concern

Health-related sections draw more complaints about workload, support, and deadlines.

What students said

“Show up and be respectful. This class is an easy A.”
KIN047
“Very helpful. Very accommodating.”
PE74A
“Teacher wasn't very helpful, but the .”
HLTH2

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online evidence is split between an easy low-effort Health class and a harsh review about heavy work and ambiguous quizzes.

Main concern

Weekly workload and online class harder than expected.

What students said

“Expects loads of so ambiguously that it doesnt demonstrate actual knowledge of material”
HEALT2
“Do the work and you'll get an A.”
HLTH2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

wording and one in-person-labeled review saying book use was allowed on tests.

Ambiguous QuizzesBook Allowed On TestsTimed Test Questions

Assessment risk

Varies

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person-labeled reviews mention frequent tests, timed questions, and one comment that students could use the book on tests.

Book Allowed On TestsTimed Test Questions
“you do get to use your book on the tests”
HLTH2
“Only give you 1 minute per question on tests.”
HEALT2

Online

Online reviews mention ambiguous quizzes and exams but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, or Lockdown Browser rules.

Ambiguous Quizzes
“ so ambiguously”
HEALT2

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Show up and be respectful. This class is an easy A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 24 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“She is incredibly funny and very wise.”

📚 Workload Reality

45/100

“Expects loads of ”

⚖️ Grade Effort

68/100

“Do the work and you'll get an A.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She has good stories in her lectures and is very hands on.
  • Very helpful. Very accommodating.
  • She makes class fun while learning.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This class is an easy A.
  • Its easy work but with ridiculous deadlines.
  • class requires alot of work but its not really difficult work.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • so ambiguously
  • Teacher wasn't very helpful
  • Rude and very unfriendly!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

24

Recent reviews read by the AI

24

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

The 24 reviews span many years and courses, with enough detail to show clear differences by class type and format.

Inside 24 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 53
3 out of 57
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

HLTH26 reviews
HEALT24 reviews
PE3 reviews
KIN0472 reviews
PE74A2 reviews
Show 7 more courses
ENGENG21 review
INTROSPTSMED1 review
INTROTOSPORTMED1 review
PE1181 review
PE171 review
PE18A1 review
PE71 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values