AI Rate Professor

Communication

Mark Hall

RTVF15 · RTFV12 · SOC7112 · SOC7121 · RTVF13 · SOC12 · RTVF12 · RTFV15 · RTV13 · RFTV15 · RTVF015 · FILM · 200 lifetime ratings

AI rating
15/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Avoid unless and can tolerate unpredictable grading.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh gradingInconsistent expectationsHeavy writing workloadRude communicationSome strong feedback
  • Most complaints and .
  • A minority of students say he improves writing if you follow rubrics closely and accept criticism.
  • The course is more writing-heavy than many students expect, especially in film and media classes.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

20/100

Getting an A appears possible for disciplined writers, but many students say grades are harsh, inconsistent, and not proportional to effort.

Online and reviews emphasizing unclear instructions and in-person reviews emphasizing random results.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The subject matter is not described as advanced, but the writing expectations, detailed evidence requirements, and .

Online reviews mention long modules and weekly media work, while and grading standards.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

Some reviews mention participation and skipping class as risky, but .

Online evidence points to required posts and participation, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

Most students do not recommend him because , and unclear expectations.

Both formats trend negative, though each has a small group of and rigor.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Students repeatedly describe grading as harsh, random, inconsistent, and disconnected from rubrics.

Format shift

Online reviews often cite harsh discussion and , while bizarre.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The workload includes long readings, films, clips, posts, essays, and detailed writing expectations.

Format shift

Online reviews describe long modules and weekly media work, while and assignments that may not always count.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

A few students praise his feedback, but most describe him as .

Format shift

Online reviews focus on poor communication, while and classroom experience.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

Reviews focus on essays, discussion posts, written responses, readings, films, and rubrics rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats are assignment-heavy, with online reviews especially centered on posts and essays.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

33 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are also mostly negative, but a , and subject knowledge.

Main concern

Students report , and confusion about what earns a strong grade.

What students said

“There is much to be said about this instructor, but if there .”
RTFV12
“Follow the instructions and and you will get an A.”
RTVF13
“ and clarity for expectations is non-existent.”
SOC12

Remote format

Online

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are mostly negative, with repeated complaints , and rude communication.

Main concern

, and hard to decode.

What students said

“If you do exactly as he instructs you'll get a C.”
RTVF015
“ and does not appear .”
RTVF12
“Professor Hall has crafted an excellent and informative class, which is noteworthy considering that it's online.”
RTFV12

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the use, or open-book policy.

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, closed-book rule, proctoring rule, or final exam structure.

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove any exam format, proctoring rule, webcam rule, Lockdown Browser use, or open-book policy.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you don't want to have a .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation strength; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“He has a and punishes you for it.”

⚖️

12/100

“ and does not appear .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

24/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Did not help at all.
  • He honestly improves your creative writing, and teaches interesting material!
  • Mr. Hall communicates very well both in

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You have to be very specific or you'll fail the class easily.
  • .
  • Follow the instructions and and you will get an A.

Theme 3

💬 About Communication

  • Terrible communicator and grader.
  • His comments and responses are rude and he is the .
  • He always responded to my questions and provided me with writing examples.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

200

Lifetime ratings

76/100

Evidence confidence

The sample is large and , but many reviews are old and some course-format labels conflict with review text.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 557
4 out of 526
3 out of 523
2 out of 536
1 out of 558

Course coverage

SOC1213 reviews
RTVF1511 reviews
RTFV125 reviews
RTVF0155 reviews
RTVF135 reviews
Show 8 more courses
RTVF124 reviews
11111 review
FILM1 review
RFTV151 review
RTFV151 review
RTV131 review
SOC71121 review
SOC71211 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

6

A 4 · A- 2

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1