AI Rate Professor

Agriculture

Justin Edson

AGS20 · AGMA44 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you want a and are willing to keep up with quizzes, notes, and reading.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringSupportiveClear gradingPop quizzesHands-on work
  • Students strongly recommend him because , and approachable.
  • Getting a high grade looks realistic with , and reading.
  • The main , and midterms.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

An A looks very reachable because students earned A+ grades, but , and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

The courses are approachable and hands-on, but , and .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Attendance is not clearly described as mandatory, but participation and .

Only in-person reviews mention participation and pop quizzes; there is .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

95/100

Students consistently recommend him because , and makes the class manageable.

All recommendation evidence comes from in-person reviews, and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Grades appear fair and attainable because students report and multiple A+ outcomes.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

54/100

The workload is steady rather than light, with , and two midterms.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Students describe him as caring, encouraging, down to earth, and helpful when they feel unsure.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessment blends , and hands-on work.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe him as , and manageable with consistent preparation.

Main concern

, and reading can punish students who fall behind.

What students said

“Edson walked me through every step and never stopped giving words of courage.”
AGMA44
“Just make sure to always do the and study the Lecture notes and you should be fine.”
AGS20
“ . Two midterms.”
AGS20

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention pop quizzes, weekly Canvas quizzes, and two midterms, but do not .

Pop QuizzesWeekly Online QuizzesTwo Midterms

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

quizzes, and two midterms, but do not prove proctoring or open-book policy.

Pop QuizzesWeekly Online QuizzesTwo Midterms
“ .”
AGS20
“ . Two midterms.”
AGS20

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I would take his class 1,000 times over just because hes great.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“Edson walked me through every step and never stopped giving words of courage.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

95/100

“ .”

⚖️ Grade Path

80/100

“Just make sure to always do the and study the Lecture notes and you should be fine.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Edson walked me through every step and never stopped giving words of courage.
  • Very down to earth and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • For the most part he was a pretty simple professor, .
  • Just make sure to always do the and study the Lecture notes and you should be fine.
  • He doesn't cover everything in class lectures so .

Theme 3

🧪 About Class Structure

  • Lots of hands on work in horticulture with plants which makes the class fly by.
  • . Two midterms.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

The evidence is consistent and detailed, but credibility is limited .

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

AGS202 reviews
AGMA441 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values