AI Rate Professor

Languages

Dana Daniell

SIGN1 · SIGN202 · SIGN201 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

unless and learn much of the material independently.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing Course ManagementAttendance RequiredHeavy HomeworkLecture HeavyMixed Personality
  • Most negative , and weak ASL instruction.
  • Some students find him caring and funny, but the positive reviews are outweighed by serious complaints.
  • Attendance and participation matter, while .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Some students say passing is possible with showing up, but , and grading make an A unreliable.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The course feels hard mainly because students report , and .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Reviews and tags repeatedly indicate that showing up and participating are necessary.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

because they felt they learned little and could not track grades or assignments.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Grading is not consistently harsh, but students report , and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Students mention lots of , and participation demands.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Positive comments about caring and humor are outweighed by repeated claims of weak teaching and poor course organization.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Reviews mention homework, quizzes, assignments, signing, participation, and test-heavy structure.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are highly polarized but , and weak course organization.

Main concern

Students often say they learned little and could not track grades or assignments clearly.

What students said

“I learned nothing.”
SIGN1
“you never know what your grade is in that class and the ”
SIGN1
“ .”
SIGN202

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and test-heavy structure, but do not .

QuizzesTest HeavyReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and test-heavy work, but do not clearly prove exam policy or .

QuizzesTest Heavy
“I didn't always do well on the .”
SIGN202
“ ”
SIGN1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation strength; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“I learned nothing.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

28/100

“ .”

⚖️

28/100

“you never know what your grade is in that class and the ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Dana is just not a good teacher.
  • he uses the 2 hours in class talking super slow and going off on irrelevant tangents.
  • He is a great teacher. Funny, Caring and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • so you never know anything about your grade or assignments
  • he marked me down for .
  • He would give you a good grade even if you don't sign at all.

Theme 3

🚨 About Course Experience

  • .
  • He talk too much and didn't give student a time for practice their sign.
  • He doesn't require much, bascially show up, participate and you should pass the class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

Eight in-person reviews over several years show consistent concerns despite some polarized opinions.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

SIGN14 reviews
SIGN2012 reviews
SIGN2022 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values