AI Rate Professor

Physical Sciences

Dennis Lundy

PSC52 · INTROTOWEATHE · PSY40 · HIST101 · PSC50 · PSC51 · WETHR4553 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

Avoid unless the course is required and you are ready , and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh graderMandatory attendanceBoring lecturesWeekly quizzesReads from textbook
  • Most reviews describe confusing, monotone lectures that .
  • Grades are described as harsh, with , and little or .
  • as mandatory, and missing class can seriously hurt the grade.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Getting an A appears very hard because students , and no curve.

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The content itself may be manageable, but and .

; there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

Several reviews say attendance is required, with .

; there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most students warn against taking him because they found the , and poorly connected to graded work.

; there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

8/100

Students repeatedly describe strict grading, low quiz averages, exact-answer expectations, and .

Format shift

; there are no online reviews.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

The workload centers on frequent quizzes, labs or papers, and .

Format shift

All ; there are no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Awful

22/100

Most comments , and weak support, with only a few positive lab comments.

Format shift

All ; there are no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Reviews emphasize weekly quizzes and and a paper mentioned.

Format shift

All ; there are no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mostly negative, , and mandatory attendance.

Main concern

Students repeatedly say grades are hard to earn because quizzes and .

What students said

“ .”
PSC50
“You must come to every class and you will be fine!”
PSC50
“BORING, reads from book”
PSC52

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention frequent quizzes and exact-answer tests, but they do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, webcam, or proctoring rules.

Weekly QuizzesExact-Answer TestsNo Study GuideNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and exact-answer tests, but do not clearly prove book or .

Weekly QuizzesExact-Answer TestsNo Study Guide
“there is a ”
PSC50
“he gives no study guide, looks for ”
HIST101
“ answer”
PSC52

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and attendance. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“Not helpful and does nothing to help make the class any more interesting.”

⚖️

8/100

“ .”

👍 Recommendation Level

28/100

“ if you can!!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • BORING, reads from book
  • He reads from the book...
  • Very dry class, monotone.
  • this teacher does not know .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • our class average on the weekly quizzes was never above a 68%, sometimes they were as low as a 57%.
  • .
  • answer
  • Not very many .

Theme 3

🧭

  • Must attend each class or else you risk dropping a whole letter grade.
  • You must come to every class and you will be fine!
  • study. put the work in. ask questions.
  • if you have to.. *YAWN*

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 14 detailed in-person reviews across several years show a consistent pattern of and poor lectures.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 58

Course coverage

PSC506 reviews
PSC513 reviews
HIST1011 review
INTROTOWEATHE1 review
PSC521 review
Show 2 more courses
PSY401 review
WETHR45531 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values