AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Thomas Parker

PHIL16 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
1.7

The decision

if you can attend consistently, speak up, and handle lecture-based philosophy classes.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTake-home examsLecture heavyFair workloadCaring teacherAttendance strict
  • Reviews are split between one strong negative experience and two strong positive ones.
  • Positive reviews describe clear teaching, reasonable work, and .
  • The , and lecture-heavy delivery.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Two students earned A grades and describe reasonable workload or straightforward tests, but attendance and late-work rules add risk.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The course seems accessible when students participate and follow lectures, though one student felt lost without background knowledge.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

One review and .

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

because two reviews praise his teaching and exams, but one strongly warns against the class.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Grades and comments suggest fair results for students who attend, participate, and complete the work.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

72/100

One student calls the workload very reasonable, though another mentions reading and homework.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Most reviews praise his clarity, care, and lectures, but one review says the lectures were not enjoyable.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

, and lecture knowledge rather than projects or homework.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed but lean positive, with praise for and and lecture load.

Main concern

and no late work can punish students who fall behind.

What students said

“The work load is very reasonable, and .”
PHIL16
“ . No late work is accepted.”
PHIL16
“Great teacher, very straight forward, great lectures i learned a lot.”
PHIL16

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is student-friendly because and another describes essay tests with no scantrons.

Take-Home ExamsEssay TestsNo Scantrons

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

86/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and essay tests, but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or closed-book rules.

Take-Home ExamsEssay TestsNo Scantrons
“The work load is very reasonable, and .”
PHIL16
“ .”
PHIL16

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The work load is very reasonable, and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, exams, and attendance. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Great teacher, very straight forward, great lectures i learned a lot.”

📝

86/100

“The work load is very reasonable, and .”

⚠️

15/100

“ . No late work is accepted.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great teacher, very straight forward, great lectures i learned a lot.
  • He is unbiased when discussing .
  • Didnt enjoy his lectures. Honestly, its just him talking, so much talking.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The work load is very reasonable, and .
  • .
  • No late work is accepted.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

, but they include specific details and .

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PHIL163 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1