AI Rate Professor

English

Josh Feltman

ENGLISH · ENG002 · ENG6220 · ENGL2 · LEAD219 · ENGL02 · ENGL6304 · ENG119 · ENGLISH2 · ENG2 · 25 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Take him if you want a low-pressure discussion-based English class, but and do .

Best fit · Effort For RewardFunny lecturerDiscussion basedEasy essaysPoor email responseDisorganized grading
  • Students often describe the class as easy if they show up, read, and complete the papers.
  • Many liked his humor and discussion style, but several found him boring, unresponsive, or disorganized.
  • Grades depend heavily on turning in and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Getting an A seems realistic with , and completed essays, though disorganization can create avoidable risk.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The course content is usually described as easy English work, though some readings and .

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person English reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

as formally mandatory, but students repeatedly say showing up and participating matters.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

and ease, but recent negative comments warn about boring lectures and poor communication.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

because there are few papers and some resubmission chances, but several students report harsh or .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

72/100

Workload is mostly reading and essays, and many students call the assignments easy.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Students often praise his humor and lectures, but complaints about monotone monologues and weak support lower the score.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews emphasize essays, papers, reading, and discussion rather than exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

25 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

a funny discussion style but inconsistent organization and communication.

Main concern

Disorganization and poor .

What students said

“As long as you show up and follow the syllabus (it tells you all of the assignments and .”
ENG2
“ . Does not use Blackboard or Canvas.”
ENG2
“If .”
ENGL2

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the open-book.

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“As long as you show up and follow the syllabus (it tells you all of the assignments and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 25 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and communication. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“Feltman is a great lecturer and a pretty chill guy over all.”

📈 Easy A Potential

82/100

“ . Easy as that.”

⚠️ Communication Risk

38/100

“ . Does not use Blackboard or Canvas.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is very funny and is willing to !
  • If .
  • Too monotone and boring.

Theme 2

📄 About Workload & Grades

  • and so that way the class can have a discussion about what you just read.
  • You have to turn in all four papers to pass, but !
  • He often made me feel uncomfortable in class and he is a .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization

  • He is a little disorganize, which makes it easy for , and then fail the class.
  • .
  • doesn't show anything on blackboard about grades and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

25

Recent reviews read by the AI

25

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

There are 25 reviews over many years with , and communication issues.

Inside 25 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 515
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENGL28 reviews
ENG27 reviews
ENG1193 reviews
ENG0021 review
ENG62201 review
Show 5 more courses
ENGL021 review
ENGL63041 review
ENGLISH1 review
ENGLISH21 review
LEAD2191 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values