AI Rate Professor

Design

Terry Givens

ART31 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
20/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

if you need real design instruction, but self-sufficient students may find the grade easy.

Best fit · Self Taught ProWeak software helpEasy AMandatory attendanceLow engagementFew graded items
  • The student got an A and found the course very easy.
  • The main complaint is that the instructor could not help students beyond beginner level.
  • finished.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

92/100

The student earned an A, rated difficulty very low, and finished the .

The easy A evidence .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

88/100

The course sounds too basic for anyone beyond a new design student.

Only in-person evidence exists, and it describes the course as beginner-level.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

5/100

The student says they still had to show up after finishing the .

Only in-person evidence exists, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

The because the course lacked useful instruction.

The negative recommendation evidence comes only from the in-person review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

An A, very low difficulty, and few .

Format shift

Only the .

Workload

Light

85/100

The student finished the and had no extra work afterward.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists, and .

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

The instructor is described as nice but unable to teach or help with the software effectively.

Format shift

Only in-person teaching evidence exists, and it is strongly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

The main graded .

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists, and it mentions a .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The but low-value course with weak software instruction.

Main concern

The instructor may not be able to help students who already know the software.

What students said

“She knows less about the software than a lot of the students”
ART31
“I wouldnt want her as a teacher again.”
ART31
“She gave me nothing else to do but still made me show up and be bored.”
ART31

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The policy.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Although shes a as a teacher again.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting teaching weakness, grade ease, and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“She knows less about the software than a lot of the students”

📈 Grade Ease

92/100

“I was done with the final project 2 weeks before the final.”

🚪

5/100

“She gave me nothing else to do but still made me show up and be bored.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Although shes a as a teacher again.
  • She knows less about the software than a lot of the students

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I was done with the final project 2 weeks before the final.
  • She gave me nothing else to do but still made me show up and be bored.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

30/100

Evidence confidence

Only one review from 2018 is available, so the negative teaching signal has limited reliability.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ART311 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values