AI Rate Professor

Communication

Christina Barber

CMST9 · CMST2 · CMST4 · CMST12 · COMST10 · PUBLICSPEAKING · CMST10 · M4895 · CMSTCMST · CMCS125 · CMST13 · M5887 · CMSTM620 · 48 lifetime ratings

AI rating
70/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
83.33%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Take her if you like lively discussion and , but if sarcasm or strict participation expectations will hurt your experience.

Best fit · Effort For RewardFunny and High EnergyCaring but SarcasticFair Tough GraderParticipation HeavyDisorganized at Times
  • Students often praise her humor, energy, and ability to make communication topics easier to understand.
  • Grades are usually described as earned rather than easy, with , and participation mattering.
  • The main risk is her sharp sarcasm, disorganization, and occasional comments that some students found disrespectful.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

48/100

An A is possible, but comments repeatedly say she is fair or tough and does not hand out high grades for just showing up.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

The course content is usually approachable because , though speeches, reading, and attention to detail still matter.

Only in-person reviews describe the course difficulty, with .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Attendance and participation appear important, with and absence penalties.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

, and care, but a sizable minority warn about sarcasm, disorganization, and harsh interactions.

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Students often describe her as fair but tough, with several warning that A grades are not automatic.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The workload is manageable if students attend, read, and prepare, but , and end-of-term pressure can add up.

Format shift

Workload comments are only from in-person classes.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Many students , and caring, while others report rude sarcasm and uneven classroom tone.

Format shift

Teaching-quality .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews , and tests, so assessment is not purely exam-based or assignment-based.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

48 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews show a funny, energetic teacher who can be helpful and memorable, but also polarizing because of , and .

Main concern

Students who dislike sarcasm, public critique, or .

What students said

“Hilarious teacher who truly cares about her students and wants to see them succeed.”
CMST2
“Do not expect an easy A.”
PUBLICSPEAKING
“ .”
CMST13

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews , and they do not prove open-book rules, proctoring, webcam use, or closed-book exams.

Tests From BookDefinition-Based TestsExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove the .

Tests From BookDefinition-Based Tests
“ .”
CMST10
“tests...which are straight from the book!!”
CMST4

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . She is funny, smart, and knows how to teach.”

Voice snapshots generated from 48 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and classroom fit. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“She makes you feel comfortable and respects all students.”

⚖️

32/100

“She does not easily give A's, so do not expect one just for showing up.”

👍 Recommendation Level

72/100

“ !!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She has a plethora of amazing examples and exercises that makes understanding the abstract concepts of communication much easier to understand.
  • Great teacher. Really encourages outside the box thinking, and she presents things in a way that makes them easy to understand.
  • Good teaching, varies style based on class participation.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Do not expect an easy A.
  • She is a . You will receive what you earn.
  • Easy class. Just attend and do the homework.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Fit

  • .
  • deal out of it and single u out
  • She is disrespectful to her students and makes inappropriate comments.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

48

Recent reviews read by the AI

48

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 48 in-person reviews across many years with rich but somewhat polarized comments.

Inside 48 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 520
4 out of 511
3 out of 512
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CMST216 reviews
CMST411 reviews
CMST109 reviews
CMST133 reviews
CMCS1251 review
Show 8 more courses
CMST121 review
CMST91 review
CMSTCMST1 review
CMSTM6201 review
COMST101 review
M48951 review
M58871 review
PUBLICSPEAKING1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

8

A 8

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 1 · B- 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1