AI Rate Professor

English

Stephen Metzger

ENGL002 · ENGL6608 · ENGL2 · ENG119 · ENGLISH2 · ENG2 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
90/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
83.33%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Take Stephen Metzger if you want to improve your writing and , and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerExcellent FeedbackTough GraderWriting HeavySupportiveTextbook Required
  • , and writing expertise.
  • The class is paper-heavy and rewards students who revise, attend, and engage seriously.
  • Getting an A can be difficult because several students describe him as a .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

An A is possible, but students , and the need to revise and match his expectations.

All evidence is from in-person reviews, with no online review evidence.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The course is not conceptually brutal, but the repeated essays, specific quizzes, and .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they consistently describe a writing-focused workload.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

At least , and another says attending helps students pass.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

Most students recommend him because and genuinely helps motivated writers improve.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Several students call him a tough or , though revision chances soften the impact.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Students , and revision work.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

, and ability to teach writing.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

, and portfolios rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are very positive about his teaching and feedback, but , and .

Main concern

The biggest risk is strict grading .

What students said

“He is a , but he gives you a chance to better your score at the end of the semester.”
ENG2
“He is always willing to help and .”
ENGL6608
“ .”
ENGL002

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention specific quizzes and a , but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or a .

Specific QuizzesFinal Portfolio

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a , but do not clearly prove exam rules or proctoring.

Specific QuizzesFinal Portfolio
“ .”
ENGL002
“The last one is part of the .”
ENG119

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is a , but he gives you a chance to better your score at the end of the semester.”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation strength. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“He is always willing to help and .”

⚖️

32/100

“he is the .”

👍 Recommendation Level

86/100

“Definitely a professor to build your schedule around!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Steve is a very laid back professor, but he doesn't tolerate laziness.
  • He is always willing to help and .
  • Excellent teacher. Very caring and considerate to student circumstances and offers a lot of help when needed.

Theme 2

📄 About Workload & Grades

  • He assigns a lot of essays.
  • ; you can edit and revise for more credit.
  • He is a and will only give you an A if you write the way he does in all honesty.

Theme 3

📚 About Learning Value

  • I learned a lot from his class.
  • Exceptional opportunity to lerarn how to write under Steve's guidance.
  • I wasn't good at academic writing, but he helped me so much.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen detailed reviews over multiple years show consistent praise for teaching and and writing workload.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 514
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG27 reviews
ENGL25 reviews
ENG1192 reviews
ENGL0021 review
ENGL66081 review
Show 1 more courses
ENGLISH21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 2 · A 3

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values