AI Rate Professor

Health Occupations

Steven Giesbrecht

EMS111 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
98/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you want a strong EMT instructor and can commit to showing up on time every class.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerAmazing lecturesStrict attendanceHard EMT contentFunny storiesNo makeups
  • Students unanimously praise his lectures, stories, clarity, and enthusiasm.
  • The EMT course is hard, but he makes the material engaging and understandable.
  • Attendance and punctuality are strict, with no makeups and missed quizzes if late.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

45/100

A strong grade is possible, but EMT is hard and missed classes, lateness, or .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The course content is difficult because EMT is demanding, even though the instructor makes it engaging.

Only in-person reviews describe the course challenge.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

Attendance and punctuality are strict, with no makeups and missed quizzes if you are late.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

Both students strongly recommend him because , and caring.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

but , and no makeups.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The workload is not described as excessive, but the hard EMT material and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload and course demands.

Teaching experience

Excellent

94/100

Students describe him as , and able to connect stories to lectures.

Format shift

, and both are strongly positive.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention quizzes and lectures but do not clearly describe the .

Format shift

and no makeups.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews describe an excellent, funny, story-driven instructor for a difficult EMT course.

Main concern

, and .

What students said

“Amazing teacher, has a lot of stories that he uses to relate to the lectures.”
EMS111
“EMT is very hard but Mr G makes it fun and interesting.”
EMS111
“DON'T BE LATE to class!!”
EMS111

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews clearly mention quizzes and no makeups, but .

Quizzes MentionedNo MakeupsStrict Punctuality

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove broader exam policy.

Quizzes MentionedNo MakeupsStrict Punctuality
“No make ups.”
EMS111
“if you miss the .”
EMS111

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“EMT is very hard but Mr G makes it fun and interesting.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, difficulty, and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

94/100

“Amazing teacher, has a lot of stories that he uses to relate to the lectures.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

98/100

“Great instructor!”

⏰

10/100

“Don't skip class. No make ups.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing teacher, has a lot of stories that he uses to relate to the lectures.
  • He really cares about the subject matter.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • EMT is very hard but Mr G makes it fun and interesting.
  • if you miss the .

Theme 3

⏰

  • Don't skip class.
  • DON'T BE LATE to class!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there are only 2 reviews, even though both are detailed and consistent.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

EMS1112 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values