AI Rate Professor

Health Science

June Gnass

FN5172 · FOODNUTRITION · FN50 · FN2 · HIST101 · FN002 · FNFN · 33 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take her if you , and use to protect your grade.

Best fit · Effort For RewardKnowledgeable nutrition expertExtra credit availableAttendance mattersLecture heavyMixed exam clarity
  • Most students find the class useful, practical, and often easy if they attend and keep up.
  • and clear assignment structure can make the grade .
  • Negative , and mandatory in-class work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

The A is very reachable through attendance, assignments, and , but it is not effortless for .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The nutrition content is usually practical and approachable, though some students find the lecture volume and .

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

32/100

because in-class assignments, participation, and missed late work affect grades.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

73/100

Most students recommend her because the , and supported by .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

and many point opportunities make grading forgiving, though .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

60/100

Assignments are usually easy but , and one major diet project.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

Students often call her knowledgeable, professional, and engaging, while some describe her as intimidating or disorganized.

Format shift

, and the tone is mostly positive with recurring reservations.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Grades appear to combine assignments, in-class work, projects, participation, , and tests.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

33 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and manageable class with strong attendance expectations and .

Main concern

Skipping class or because in-class work and due dates matter.

What students said

“Be there (not just physically), and its an easy A.”
FN002
“ .”
FN2
“ .”
FN2

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews , and students disagree on whether tests are easy or hard.

Hard TestsStudy Guides UnclearSome Easy Tests

Assessment risk

Varies

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and study guides but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, midterm, or .

Hard TestsEasy TestsStudy Guides On Canvas
“ .”
FN2
“ .”
FN2
“But ”
FN50

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Be there (not just physically), and its an easy A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 33 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

74/100

“She knows what she is talking about and conveys it well.”

📈 Grade Value

78/100

“She has so much opportunities! No excuse to not pass.”

⚠️

32/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is very professional and cares about her work!
  • She cares a lot for her work and her lectures are very engaging!
  • She's knowledgeable about material being taught.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • At best put in 70% effort into this class still received an A.
  • .
  • .

Theme 3

🧭 About Class Expectations

  • Just keep up with online assignments and due dates.
  • Make sure your in class because she doesn't accept late work!
  • Some in .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

33

Recent reviews read by the AI

33

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-three in-person reviews across many years give broad, detailed, and mostly consistent evidence despite some older comments.

Inside 33 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 510
3 out of 54
2 out of 55
1 out of 51

Course coverage

FN223 reviews
FN0023 reviews
FN503 reviews
FN51721 review
FNFN1 review
Show 2 more courses
FOODNUTRITION1 review
HIST1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 5

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not_Sure_Yet 2