AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Julianne Green

CHEM10 · CHEM110 · CHEM110LAB · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
50/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

if you are willing to attend, ask questions, and use support resources in a difficult chemistry course.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful When AskedHard ChemistryMixed Teaching QualityTough GradingClear Expectations
  • Students describe chemistry as hard, but several say Green makes it more understandable when they attend and ask for help.
  • Reviews are strongly split between helpful, caring instruction and complaints that .
  • Grades appear possible with effort, tutoring, notes, and , but as easy.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

An A is possible with , and , but students do not describe it as low effort.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

Chemistry is repeatedly described as hard, though some students say her help makes it more understandable.

because there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

35/100

Reviews imply showing up matters, but they do not prove a .

because there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Recommendation depends on whether the student gets the helpful version described by positive reviews or the .

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

, while positive reviews suggest criteria can be straightforward if students keep up.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Students mention , and , suggesting steady work rather than a light course.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Teaching quality is mixed, with strong praise for helpfulness and strong criticism of .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and , pointing to a mix of assignments and exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are polarized, with later students praising her help and clarity while .

Main concern

Teaching clarity and .

What students said

“she made a very hard class... understandable.”
CHEM110
“Straight forward criteria and grading.”
CHEM110LAB
“ and a bad instructor do not mix.”
CHEM110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests but do not clearly prove exam format, .

Exam Policy Unclear

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove the .

Tests MentionedExam Policy Unclear
“practice what u would do in the ”
CHEM110LAB

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“she made a very hard class... understandable.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“She REALLY helped me.”

⚖️

35/100

“ and a bad instructor do not mix.”

👍 Recommendation Split

52/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she made a very hard class... understandable.
  • She seems like she .
  • She REALLY helped me.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • do tutoring and the
  • Straight forward criteria and grading.
  • and a bad instructor do not mix.

Theme 3

❤️ About Helpfulness

  • always makes time for students before and after class
  • Helpful
  • Give her a change, there are always people @ CAS.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

66/100

Evidence confidence

Nine detailed in-person reviews over several years provide useful evidence, but opinions are polarized and older.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CHEM1104 reviews
CHEM110LAB3 reviews
1101 review
CHEM101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1