AI Rate Professor

Communication

Jan McKissick

CMST4 · CMST004 · CMSTCMST · CMSTM3126 · CMST6 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
11/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

Take this professor only if and do not need much instructor support.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy workloadConfusing assignmentsHard to reachDemanding projectsMixed teaching quality
  • and poor communication.
  • A few students found her fair, encouraging, and .
  • The course appears assignment-heavy with community service or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Getting an A appears possible but costly because , and unclear requirements.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The communication content itself is not described as advanced, but the course feels difficult because and demanding.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online comparison.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Participation, group work, and and outside coordination feel important.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Most students warn against taking her because of , and poor communication.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Few grades are reported, but the workload and assignment complaints suggest grades require substantial compliance with .

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

15/100

Students repeatedly describe the workload as far beyond expectations for the course.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Positive comments exist, but most reviews describe confusing communication, hostility, or lack of useful help.

Format shift

, and they are mostly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

, and assignment sheets more than exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mostly negative, with repeated , and poor accessibility.

Main concern

Students repeatedly say the workload and and too demanding.

What students said

“ .”
CMSTCMST
“ poor communicator; how ironic!”
CMST4
“I also asked her for help several times and she referred me to the .”
CMST6

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

exam policy.

Exam policy not clearly proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Just listen to me and believe what I am about to tell you: GET A DIFFERENT INSTRUCTOR.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and communication. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Recommendation Risk

25/100

“ if you can. .”

📚 Workload Pressure

15/100

“Work load WAY over three units.”

🧭 Teaching Clarity

25/100

“ poor communicator; how ironic!”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • She is a , but was asking WAY too much of her class.
  • She has a HUGE packet of all the the semester.
  • This class is insane.

Theme 2

🧭 About Communication

  • .
  • I looked at her course outline and and outdated.
  • I also asked her for help several times and she referred me to the .

Theme 3

👍 Positive Exceptions

  • I found the class tough, but fair.
  • Her class is not only fun but I left her class with a higher sense of confidence that has helped me in all aspects of my life.
  • She was very clear in what she wanted done for the class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

There are 12 reviews with consistent workload and communication complaints, but many are old and some positive reviews conflict with the dominant tone.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 56

Course coverage

CMST47 reviews
CMST62 reviews
CMST0041 review
CMSTCMST1 review
CMSTM31261 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values