AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Jaime Raigoza

CSCI20 · CSCI25 · CSCI4 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you are comfortable teaching yourself advanced technical material and want a challenge.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerAdvanced materialExtra creditWeak explanationsSloppy structureCaring but demanding
  • Students describe him as nice and caring, but and structure are weak.
  • CSCI25 can move far beyond basic Linux into heavy scripting and kernel work.
  • helps motivated students, but the class is not easy for beginners.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

can help determined students, but and weak guidance make an A require real effort.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The course content can become advanced quickly, including bash scripting, virtual servers, and kernel work.

Only in-person reviews describe the course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

One tag says skipping class means you will not pass, and as optional.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Students recommend him for serious computer geeks but and weak course structure.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

68/100

, but the reviews do not prove grading is effortless.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention grading support through .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students report weekly labs and advanced technical projects that exceed basic-course expectations.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

He is described as caring and knowledgeable, but multiple students say lectures are weak or .

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews emphasize labs, scripting, and technical projects rather than exams.

Format shift

evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews show a demanding class with , and mixed teaching quality.

Main concern

The main concern is that basic courses may become too advanced with too little instruction.

What students said

“His classes are for hard-core computer geeks.”
CSCI25
“Taught material way to advanced for a basic course.”
CSCI25
“Lectures are boring and .”
CSCI20

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Unclear

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format or rules.

Exam Policy Unclear

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want to push yourself and really dive deep into the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“Lectures are boring and .”

📈 Difficulty Level

30/100

“Taught material way to advanced for a basic course.”

💯

68/100

“He gives loads of for determination.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is a !
  • No real lecture time at all.
  • Class structure was rather sloppy in my opinion.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • His classes are for hard-core computer geeks.
  • We then started doing heavy bash scripting and customizing our kernal with for.
  • He gives loads of for determination.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Five reviews show consistent concerns about advanced material and , but the evidence is old and course-specific.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 53
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CSCI253 reviews
CSCI201 review
CSCI41 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values