AI Rate Professor

Health Occupations

Mathias Willmann

EMS111 · EMS11 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you want serious field preparation and can handle challenge, because student experience appears very inconsistent.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerChallenging LabsExam PreparationSerious InstructorMixed Teaching ReviewsStudent Feedback Concerns
  • The two reviews conflict sharply, with one calling him one of the and another praising him as an excellent medic instructor.
  • .
  • and preparation for the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Even with one reported A, the comments describe a serious and challenging course rather than an easy path to a top grade.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The course appears demanding because labs, fake scenes, and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The reviews .

Evidence comes only from in-person reviews, with .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

The recommendation signal is weak because the and the teaching reviews are highly polarized.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Tests are described as preparation for the and the course is meant to be challenging, suggesting strict expectations.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

The , and serious exam preparation.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

and one strong practical-training endorsement.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

and scenario-based performance, based on the available comments.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

responsiveness against praise for serious exam and lab preparation.

Main concern

The main concern is inconsistent teaching experience and .

What students said

“Does whatever he wants and .”
EMS111
“Class, and the .”
EMS11
“He teaches what needs to be known for the ”
EMS11

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests that prepare students for the and challenging fake scenes, but do not clearly prove book rules or .

NEMT Exam PreparationChallenging TestsScenario Based Labs

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and challenging fake scenes, but do not clearly prove book rules or proctoring policy.

NEMT Exam PreparationChallenging TestsScenario Based Labs
“He teaches what needs to be known for the , and .”
EMS11
“The fake scene that the squads response to testes your knowledge, and meant to be challenging.”
EMS11

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The fake scene that the squads response to testes your knowledge, and meant to be challenging.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, challenge, and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“One of the and instructor ever.”

⚠️ Student Concerns

30/100

“May be one of the so far in college.”

📚 Challenge Level

30/100

“The fake scene that the squads response to testes your knowledge, and meant to be challenging.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Does whatever he wants and .
  • He is a serious instructor who wants new EMT-Bparamedic to be success in the field.

Theme 2

🧪

  • Class, and the .
  • He teaches what needs to be known for the , and .
  • The fake scene that the squads response to testes your knowledge, and meant to be challenging.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there and they strongly conflict.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

EMS111 review
EMS1111 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values