AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Francesco Madaro

ENGR01 · ENGR001 · ENGR4 · ENGR3 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you are serious about engineering and and assignments.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPassionate engineerEasy A potentialDisorganized structureHard to understandBest for engineering majors
  • Students often describe him as passionate and career-focused, especially for committed engineering students.
  • Several reviews say the class can be an easy A, but and organization create frustration.
  • The class is much better suited to students who already want engineering and can tolerate ambiguity.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Several students earned A or A+ grades and one explicitly says it was an easy A, but confusion can still make the path stressful.

All .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The engineering content is not always described as hard, but and solo problem solving raise the challenge.

Only in-person reviews exist, and they focus more on teaching clarity than online access.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they do not prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

Students recommend him for committed engineering majors but warn that .

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Reported grades are mostly A or A+, and comments suggest students are unlikely to fail if they work with him.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Workload seems project-based and manageable, but .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

He is passionate and supportive, but multiple , and disorganized.

Format shift

and confusion.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews emphasize projects, assignments, class work, and engineering design more than exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews show a passionate professor with useful engineering motivation, but and .

Main concern

Students may struggle with , and .

What students said

“Dr. Madaro is VERY passionate about the field of engineering.”
ENGR001
“it was an easy A if you really want to”
ENGR01
“ and his expectations.”
ENGR001

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and assignments, but do not clearly prove exam format or proctoring.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you are set on becoming an engineer, he is your go too guy.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and projects. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“Very inspirational, kind, passionate about his work & his students.”

⚖️

76/100

“it was an easy A if you really want to”

🧭 Organization

55/100

“ and his expectations.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Dr. Madaro is VERY passionate about the field of engineering.
  • Very inspirational, kind, passionate about his work & his students.
  • He often goes off topic and it is sometimes hard to understand what he is saying because he has an Italian accent.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • it was an easy A if you really want to
  • This should be an easy A, but his poor ability to explain the material .
  • but he works with you so it's not like you are going to fail.

Theme 3

🛠️ About Projects

  • You mainly have class but
  • Class was fun. We split into teams and were allowed to pick any civil engineering design project we could think up, which was awesome.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Seven in-person reviews give useful but polarized detail, with no online evidence and .

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGR0014 reviews
ENGR011 review
ENGR31 review
ENGR41 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 2 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2