AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Linda Lucena

HEALTH · HLTHHLTH · HLTH2 · HEALTH2 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if you can tolerate dry lectures and a strict tone in exchange for relatively easy health content.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEasy contentBoring lecturesExtra creditStrict attitudeMixed fairness
  • Students often describe the class as easy or basic, but many find the lectures dry and unengaging.
  • Grades can be helped by and open-book winter tests, though participation and .
  • Student opinion is sharply split between fair and knowledgeable versus rude, smug, or unwilling to help.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Getting an A seems realistic because students , and open-book winter tests, though and tricky wording add risk.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

82/100

The course content is repeatedly described as basic health material, even when students dislike the teaching style.

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Reviews mention going to class, class participation, in-class activities, and fast note-taking, so .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

because the class can be easy, but many comments strongly criticize her tone and teaching style.

The recommendation judgment .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Grading appears mixed because and open-book tests help, but and tricky test wording caused complaints.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

72/100

Most workload comments suggest limited homework, notes, chapter reviews, class activities, and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Average

42/100

Teaching quality is inconsistent, with some students calling her fair and knowledgeable while many describe her as boring, rude, or unwilling to help.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Assessment appears test-heavy, with repeated mentions of , and some homework or class activities.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

but boring health class with mixed teaching quality and occasional .

Main concern

The main concern is a dry lecture style and repeated complaints about rude or judgmental behavior.

What students said

“All in all, a pretty easy class.”
HLTHHLTH
“What we go over in class is NOT on the test.”
HEALTH
“ .”
HLTH2

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because winter-session tests were open book, but students also mention many tests, tricky wording, and unclear alignment with class material.

Open Book Winter TestsMany TestsTricky WordingUnclear Test Alignment

Assessment risk

Varies

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews , and tricky or poorly aligned test wording.

Open Book Winter TestsMany TestsTricky WordingUnclear Test Alignment
“she lets you so your garunteed an A”
HLTH2
“ but still tricky due to wording.”
HLTH2
“What we go over in class is NOT on the test.”
HEALTH

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This teacher was good. A little dry at times, but still good.”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“Very dry and boring. It's as if she has no emotion.”

📈 Easy Grade Potential

78/100

“The best part is she offers tons of , and there's not a lot of homework.”

⚖️

58/100

“I went to 90% of class, got , yet my 'class participation' was a low D.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is boring and dull.
  • This teacher was good. A little dry at times, but still good.
  • i think she's fair and willing to answer any questions you have...

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • All in all, a pretty easy class.
  • Very dry and boring. It's as if she has no emotion. Fairly easy class though, she does allow a lot of .
  • very easy during winter session, she lets you so your garunteed an A

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Concerns

  • Most condescending teacher at Butte.
  • Glares at students when they ask questions, interrupts, then makes rude faces when answering.
  • She has a rude attitude and lack of interest in the class she teaches and it's students.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

There are 17 reviews with consistent themes, but they are old and mostly lack recent detail.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 55
3 out of 53
2 out of 53
1 out of 53

Course coverage

HEALTH28 reviews
HEALTH4 reviews
HLTH24 reviews
HLTHHLTH1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not_Sure_Yet 2