AI Rate Professor

Agriculture

Susan Hearne

NATRES · NRLAWNR · NR60 · NATUR60 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
73/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.4

The decision

Take her if you want a low-difficulty in-person class, but be aware that and .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyHelpful and humorousMostly well likedVery easy difficultyOne grading complaint
  • Most reviews describe Susan Hearne as helpful, interesting, and .
  • One detailed and poor course organization.
  • The evidence is old and thin, so the positive pattern has only medium credibility.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

The class seems low difficulty, but the only reported grade is a C tied to a , so an A is not proven to be easy.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

75/100

Students rate the difficulty very low and describe the class as manageable, though one review says lectures conflicted with the book.

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

60/100

as mandatory, but the negative review suggests showing up and doing the work mattered.

online comparison.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

Most students liked her and called her helpful, but one detailed review strongly challenges the positive pattern.

The recommendation evidence is entirely in person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

because the only concrete grade report is a C from a student who felt one paper was unfairly rejected.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

80/100

Reviews describe very low difficulty and .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Most students describe her as helpful and engaging, but and contradictory lectures.

Format shift

Only in-person teaching evidence exists.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

The only specific assessment evidence mentions a paper and general work, while .

Format shift

Assessment evidence appears only in in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are mostly positive and describe an and organization.

Main concern

A and course materials were unclear.

What students said

“ .”
NR60
“her lectures contradict the book”
NR60
“She is one of the ”
NRLAWNR

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, proctoring, or book policy.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Great Prof. For what could have been a very dry subject.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and organization. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“ .”

⚖️

45/100

“1 paper was "unusable" because she didnt agree with it.i recived a C.”

👍 Recommendation Pattern

70/100

“She is one of the have taken all her classes”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • She is one of the have taken all her classes

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • I showed up every day did all the work but 1 paper was "unusable"
  • i recived a C.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization

  • her lectures contradict the book
  • she doesnt use Black board because"I dont get paid enough"

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

There are five reviews across several years, but they are old and only one gives detailed negative evidence.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

NR602 reviews
NATRES1 review
NATUR601 review
NRLAWNR1 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values