AI Rate Professor

Business

Ellen Itteria

C1607 · ENG12 · BCIS012 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
25/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

unless you are comfortable teaching yourself from the textbook and doing busywork for a manageable grade.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized instructorEasy contentHeavy low-value homeworkImpatient with questionsAvoid recommended
  • Students repeatedly say the class content is easy if you do the work and read the text.
  • The main issue is teaching quality, with , and unable to stay on topic.
  • point value, making the class feel inefficient.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

65/100

The class is described as easy if you show up, do the homework, and read the textbook, but the workload keeps it from being a free A.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Students directly say the class itself is easy, though and poor teaching add friction.

Only in-person reviews exist, and they consistently separate easy content from weak instruction.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

, but reviews do not clearly prove a strict mandatory policy.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

because they describe her as , and a terrible instructor.

All recommendation evidence is in person and strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Grades may be manageable because the class is easy if students do the work, but there is no strong evidence of .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

One review reports 180 homework questions for only 5 points, which suggests high-volume low-reward work.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Reviews repeatedly describe her as , and unable to stay on topic.

Format shift

All and is consistently negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

The clearest and textbook work rather than exams.

Format shift

Assessment evidence appears only in in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews say the class is easy but the , and not recommended.

Main concern

Students report , and frustration when asking questions.

What students said

“ .”
BCIS012
“The class itself is easy if you show up and do your work”
C1607
“ and scattered”
ENG12

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, proctoring, or book policy.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching quality, workload, and course easiness. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“ and can not stay on topic.”

📈 Course Easiness

70/100

“The class itself is easy if you show up and do your work”

👍 Recommendation Level

20/100

“I would not recommend taking her and scattered.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Mrs. Itterea is a terrible teacher.
  • and can not stay on topic.
  • and scattered

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • The class itself is easy if you show up and do your work
  • The class is easy if you do the homework and read your text book.

Theme 3

🧾 About Workload

  • She assigns 180 questions for homework and the homework is worth 5 points.
  • make sure you read the booklet because the instructions aren't the best

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

50/100

Evidence confidence

There are only three older reviews, but their negative comments about organization and teaching are consistent.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

BCIS0121 review
C16071 review
ENG121 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1