AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

E. Moreno

MATHMATH · MATH124 · MATH108 · MATH216 · 24 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Take E. Moreno only if you are strong in , and are comfortable with a strict in-person class.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHard to understandHeavy homeworkStrict gradingAvoided by manyMixed teaching clarity
  • Many students say lectures are because and are difficult to understand.
  • The course can demand heavy homework and .
  • A few students praise her knowledge and helpfulness, but the dominant pattern is frustration and avoidance.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Getting an A appears difficult because students , and limited support.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

The math content is made , and tests that students say do not always match homework.

, so no format comparison is possible.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

as mandatory, but students repeatedly say showing up and paying attention are necessary to pass.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

Most students do not recommend her because they find the , and the .

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Students mention an , and tests that feel disconnected from homework.

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Several students describe very heavy homework, including daily large problem sets.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

She is clearly knowledgeable, but many students say and not supportive enough.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Students mention , and multiple-choice or scantron tests, with one review saying tests were about 90% of the .

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mostly negative, , and difficulty understanding lectures.

Main concern

Students often struggle to understand the lectures and keep up with the workload.

What students said

“Very difficult to understand due to accent.”
MATH124
“ .”
MATH108
“She never explained the ”
MATH108

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe traditional in-person tests, sometimes multiple choice or scantron, but they .

Multiple Choice TestsScantron TestsPractice Exam MentionedStudy Guide Evidence Conflicts

Assessment risk

Standard

43/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention multiple-choice tests, scantron tests, study guides, and practice exams, but .

Multiple Choice TestsScantron TestsPractice Exam Mentioned
“the ”
MATHMATH
“ ”
MATH108
“she gives a ”
MATH108

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is very hard to understand. If you're struggling in this course don't expect to help you. !”

Voice snapshots generated from 24 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation strength. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“She never explained the and or explained the material in a matter were students can understand.”

📚 Workload Pressure

18/100

“ .”

👍 Recommendation Level

24/100

“ and save yourself the trouble.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She talks too fast.
  • The class was really boring and incomprehensible.
  • This teacher is the clearest thinker/speaker I have ever met.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • She doesn't accept ANY late work.
  • Homework and .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She is always smiling and positive though!
  • Very smart and caring
  • She is rude and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

24

Recent reviews read by the AI

24

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 24 reviews span many years and repeatedly describe similar issues with clarity, workload, and grading.

Inside 24 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 54
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 510

Course coverage

MATH10815 reviews
MATH1247 reviews
MATH2161 review
MATHMATH1 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

3

C 3

D range

1

D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values