AI Rate Professor

Communication Studies

Kimberly Keyawa

COM · CMST4 · CMST2 · CMST331 · CMST132 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
30/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Only take Kimberly Keyawa if you can handle inconsistent expectations and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizing ExperienceHarsh GradingUnorganized ExpectationsEntertaining When Effective
  • Reviews are sharply split between very positive early experiences and very negative later ones.
  • Students complain about tough grading, unclear rubrics, contradiction, and tricky tests.
  • Positive reviews praise , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

An A looks possible, but comments , and expectations beyond the rubric.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

The content is often described as basic or manageable, but the grading and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews because there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

as strictly mandatory, but positive reviews suggest class presence helps a lot.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews because there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

Recommendation is weak because several students call the .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews because there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Students specifically complain about tough grading, rubric mismatch, and tricky tests.

Format shift

All grading evidence comes from in-person reviews.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Workload is not consistently heavy, but , and .

Format shift

All workload evidence comes from in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

45/100

Teaching quality is inconsistent, ranging from detailed and , and confusing.

Format shift

All teaching evidence comes from in-person reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Reviews mention essays, preparation, and tests, so assessment appears .

Format shift

All assessment evidence comes from in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

engaging teaching but serious complaints about grading and organization.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“She's a mentioned in assignment rubrics.”
CMST132
“Her syllabus is extremely helpful, she tells you exactly what she wants and shows you how to do so.”
CMST4

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tricky tests, but they do not clearly prove the .

Tricky TestsExam Policy Unclear

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove the exam format, book policy, or proctoring rules.

Tricky TestsExam Policy Unclear
“ because she seems to think that since the subject is relatively easy she can trick you into answering wrong.”
CMST2

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want to enjoy .”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“ board/emails and what's on blackboard.”

⚖️

22/100

“She's a mentioned in assignment rubrics.”

👍 Recommendation Level

38/100

“I highly recommend her!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Ms. K is a very detailed good teacher!
  • She has no idea what she is doing.
  • Miss K. is an awesome teacher.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Gives hour long power points on how to write a paragraph (5th grade if it is your doctorate thesis.
  • because she seems to think that since the subject is relatively easy she can trick you into answering wrong.
  • Need to apply yourself to this class.

Theme 3

❤️ About Student Experience

  • .
  • !
  • Didn't enjoy it one bit

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

, but the opinions are highly polarized and there are no recent reviews.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CMST22 reviews
COM2 reviews
CMST1321 review
CMST3311 review
CMST41 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values