AI Rate Professor

Economics

Emmanuel Dosu

ECON2 · ECON4 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
0/100
RMP rating
1.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.7

The decision

Avoid this professor unless you can teach yourself from the book and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnorganizedConfusing ExpectationsPoor TeachingTest HeavyStrongly Avoided
  • Students consistently describe the class as , and poorly taught.
  • Tests are described as , and disconnected from what was taught.
  • Students repeatedly .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

15/100

Getting an A sounds very difficult because grades depend .

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

20/100

The economics content becomes much harder because students say , and .

, and they consistently describe the class as confusing.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

In-person reviews discuss class time quality but not a .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

3/100

Students because teaching, organization, feedback, and exams are poor.

Recommendation and is consistently negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

because tests dominate, expectations are hidden, and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

15/100

The workload feels overwhelming because students report , and heavy reliance on the textbook.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload and test preparation burden.

Teaching experience

Awful

5/100

Students consistently describe him as , and ineffective at teaching economics.

Format shift

problems.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

90/100

Reviews emphasize tests, test scores, and .

Format shift

In-person reviews clearly describe a test-heavy assessment pattern.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly negative, citing disorganization, unclear teaching, poor communication, and .

Main concern

Students say expectations, exams, and and unfair.

What students said

“I DO NOT WISH THIS SUFFERING ON ANYONE!”
ECON2
“ .”
ECON4
“ !”
ECON4

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams appear strict and high-risk because , and grades based mostly on test scores.

Long TestsTest-Heavy GradingUnclear Test Coverage

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but they do not clearly prove closed-book rules or proctoring.

Long TestsTest-Heavy GradingUnclear Test Coverage
“ .”
ECON4
“ .”
ECON4
“The majority of the .”
ECON4

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very poor quality teacher. a lot of hidden expectations that are not reasonable.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

5/100

“Very poor teacher, unorganized, does not teach the subject matter at all.”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

3/100

“ .”

🧪

25/100

“The majority of the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Dosu is a and terrible teacher.
  • Very poor teacher, unorganized, does not teach the subject matter at all.
  • Hard to understand. , yet very particular about the work he will accept.

Theme 2

🧪 About Tests And Grades

  • .
  • .
  • we are expected to take a test on over 200 pgs of material with NO study guide!

Theme 3

🚫 About Student Recommendation

  • but. STAY AWAY.
  • .
  • !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Six detailed reviews from the same term are highly consistent in describing severe teaching, organization, and .

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ECON44 reviews
ECON22 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values