AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Anne Larson

MATH124 · MATH11 · MATH110 · MATH18 · MATH108 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

strong math instruction.

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy APoor ClarityGenerous GradingUnreliable TeachingLow Learning Value
  • Students repeatedly say her classes are easy to pass because .
  • Teaching clarity is the main weakness, with several .
  • This is a strong fit for grade-focused students but a weak fit for students who need to learn math well.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

95/100

Multiple students describe very , and even an A+ with little attendance.

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

Students call the classes really easy, though math content can still .

; there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

70/100

One student says they earned an A+ after attending only about 10 times, but the reviews do not clearly prove the .

; there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

, while warning that her teaching is unclear and not helpful for learning.

; there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

96/100

Students cite , and unusually forgiving outcomes.

Format shift

; there are no online reviews.

Workload

Light

82/100

as manageable, with some assignments dropped and little pressure reported by grade-focused students.

Format shift

; there are no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Most reviews say she is unclear, unhelpful, , or unreliable despite being easy to pass.

Format shift

; there are no online reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

, and a final, so assessment appears mixed rather than purely exam-based.

Format shift

; there are no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

but weak, unclear, and sometimes unreliable teaching.

Main concern

Students may pass easily while learning little.

What students said

“Literally the easiest class I've ever taken.”
MATH110
“ .”
MATH110
“Lots of , grades exams on a .”
MATH108

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is student-friendly because , and a , but formal exam rules are not clearly proven.

Curved ExamsFinal Sometimes WaivedTest Help MentionedExam Policy Not Fully Proven

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and one waived final, but they do not clearly prove proctoring or open-book policy.

Curved ExamsFinal Sometimes WaivedTest Help Mentioned
“Lots of , grades exams on a .”
MATH108
“she ”
MATH110
“ .”
MATH110

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“didn't learn a thing, but hey, passed with an A+ and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and reliability. Credibility rating: Medium.

Easy A Signal

95/100

“Literally the easiest class I've ever taken.”

Teaching Quality

25/100

“ .”

96/100

“Lots of , grades exams on a .”

Theme 1

About Teaching Style

  • .
  • she will just go over it the exact same way which is no help at all.
  • sometimes she hardly makes sense

Theme 2

About Difficulty and Grades

  • Literally the easiest class I've ever taken.
  • she is a .
  • really easy but if ur bad at math then maybe consider taking it with a more helpful teacher

Theme 3

About Reliability

  • She also never handed back a
  • she ended so gave everyone a C or better.
  • very unreliable

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Six older in-person reviews show consistent patterns about easy grading and weak teaching, but .

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH1102 reviews
MATH1081 review
MATH111 review
MATH1241 review
MATH181 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values