AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Katy luallen

PSY16 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
60/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

if you mainly want an easy A, but if structure and serious learning matter most.

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy ACaring TeacherBoring ClassUnstructured DiscussionsLow Learning Value
  • Both reviews suggest the class is very easy, but they strongly disagree on teaching quality.
  • One student says she is helpful and caring, while another says the course is boring and unstructured.
  • tolerate discussion-heavy class time.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

94/100

A student directly calls it a total easy A, and both reviews give the lowest difficulty rating.

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

88/100

The class appears very easy and .

; there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

The reviews do not clearly .

; there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

Recommendation depends on goals because one student strongly praises her support while another says learning and structure are weak.

; there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

The easy-A evidence is strong, though .

Format shift

; there are no online reviews.

Workload

Featherlight

92/100

Reviews describe a very easy class with no signs of .

Format shift

; there are no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

and claims of boredom, weak structure, and low learning value.

Format shift

; there are no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews do not mention exams and instead describe an open discussion class, so .

Format shift

; there are no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person reviews agree the class is easy but and boring, unstructured teaching.

Main concern

The class may feel too unstructured and low-value for students who want depth.

What students said

“ and really cares about her students and whether or not they do well.”
041
“total easy a, but be prepared to be bored to tears.”
PSY16

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove whether there .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove any exam policy.

Open Discussion MentionedExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“mostly an "open discussion" class”
PSY16

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“total easy a, but be prepared to be bored to tears.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in ease, teaching, and class fit. Credibility rating: Low.

Easy A Signal

94/100

“total easy a, but be prepared to be bored to tears.”

Teaching Quality

50/100

“ and really cares about her students and whether or not they do well.”

Recommendation Split

58/100

“if you're here to learn, forget it, but if you want an easy a, smile and say happy things and you'll be golden.”

Theme 1

About Teaching Style

  • Such great professor.
  • she is making up things as she goes along anf there is no structure.

Theme 2

About Difficulty and Grades

  • total easy a, but be prepared to be bored to tears.
  • if you want an easy a, smile and say happy things and you'll be golden.

Theme 3

About Class Fit

  • !
  • if you're here to learn, forget it

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

32/100

Evidence confidence

, and they strongly conflict on teaching quality.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

0411 review
PSY161 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values