AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Lola Dalton

SOC2 · SOCSOC · SOC14 · SOC014 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

unless you only need the credit and can tolerate disorganization while teaching yourself from the book.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized lecturesOften lateBook-based testsPoor communicationEasy but frustrating
  • Reviews overwhelmingly describe poor organization, repeated lectures, lateness, and outdated or opinion-heavy instruction.
  • as coming from the book rather than lectures, making class time feel low value.
  • Some students say the class is passable or an easy A, but the experience is strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

67/100

The class can be passable or easy if you turn in work, but and A.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The subject itself does not sound especially hard, but .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

80/100

One student says the class was easily passable after missing many classes, so .

, and no online evidence exists.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

Students overwhelmingly warn against taking her because of lateness, repetition, poor organization, and weak communication.

All , and it is strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Students say the course can be passed by turning in work, but reviews .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

The workload sounds heavy because one review reports 8-10 papers plus book-based tests.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Students repeatedly describe her as late, repetitive, scattered, off topic, and hard to communicate with.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment appears to combine book-based tests with multiple papers across the semester.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews consistently describe a from the book instead of lectures.

Main concern

Students say lectures are scattered, repeated, and .

What students said

“her lectures have NOTHING to do with the tests”
SOCSOC
“ !”
SOC14
“Easily passable class if you turn in work”
SOC2

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests from the book and lecture-test mismatch, but do not .

Book-Based TestsEarly TestLecture-Test Mismatch

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

book and not well aligned with lectures.

Book-Based TestsEarly TestLecture-Test Mismatch
“ .”
SOC2
“ .”
SOC2
“it's all from the book”
SOCSOC

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do yourself a favor and find another teacher.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 in-person reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and warnings. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“Lectures were scattered and her viewpoints and very dated.”

👎 Recommendation Level

15/100

“Do yourself a favor and find another teacher.”

📚 Assessment Pattern

55/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She takes what could be a great subject with debate and life and instead drones on and on.
  • Tends to be late, repeats herself.
  • and runs her class exactly that way.

Theme 2

📘

  • .
  • She assigned 8-10 papers throughout the semester.
  • Easily passable class if you turn in work

Theme 3

🚩 About Student Warnings

  • !
  • Find another course, period.
  • If !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

The 9 reviews are old but detailed and highly consistent about the same teaching problems.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 55

Course coverage

SOC24 reviews
SOC143 reviews
SOC0141 review
SOCSOC1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values