AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

John Fourcroy

MATH124 · MATHABAB · MATH108 · MTH124 · MATHOIWE · C3419 · 47 lifetime ratings

AI rating
87/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want a and are willing to attend, practice, and ask for help.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyPatient HelperClear Math ExplainerPractice-Test HeavyLenient Test DropsMixed Consistency
  • Most students , and especially helpful for students who dislike math.
  • Getting a good grade is realistic if , and use the .
  • A smaller but , and uneven organization.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

An A is very reachable with , and dropped low scores, but students still need to do the work.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The algebra content is often made understandable for math-anxious students, but some students still found the pace and .

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person algebra reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

, and one review reports an attendance-related failure, but most comments frame attendance as practical rather than strictly policed.

Only in-person reviews discuss attendance, with .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Most students recommend him for patience and support, while a minority strongly warn against him for and .

The recommendation pattern .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

, and multiple-choice tests make grading feel lenient despite some complaints about hard exams.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

56/100

as reasonable or necessary practice, but some students complain about lots of homework and frequent chapter tests.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Many students praise his patience, clarity, and willingness to help, though some describe him as .

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Reviews , and frequent exams more than major assignments.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

47 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

help, and practice-test support, though some students report confusing lectures and hard exams.

Main concern

The main risk is that his teaching style feels inconsistent, with some students finding tests harder than lectures.

What students said

“ and if you have trouble with it he is more than willing to help you understand!”
MATH124
“He gives easy options and has practice tests that are almost identical to the real tests.”
MATH124
“His tests dont match his lecture, he doesn't grade on a .”
MATH124

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe frequent tests with very similar practice tests and dropped low scores, but they do .

Frequent TestsPractice Tests Similar to Real TestsLowest Test DroppedScantron Grading

Assessment risk

Standard

64/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention tests every , and scantron grading, but do not clearly prove open-book or closed-book rules.

Frequent TestsPractice Tests Similar to Real TestsLowest Test DroppedScantron Grading
“grades easy and he has test every 2 weeks.”
MATH124
“ .”
MATH124
“grades with a scantron unlike any other math teacher ive had.”
MATH124

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“i loved mr. fourcroy! i took this class at least 5 times before, never because i'd be so lost by then that i'd just quit going. he made intermediate algebra so easy to understand, and by the end of the semester, i was actually looking forward to tests just to see how well i'd do! if you aren't good at math!”

Voice snapshots generated from 47 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“ and if you have trouble with it he is more than willing to help you understand!”

📈 Grade Path

82/100

“He gives easy options and has practice tests that are almost identical to the real tests.”

⚠️ Consistency Risk

44/100

“ . he introduces new material the day before and day of exams, and expects you to have learned it all.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Good teacher! and it.
  • John is a great teacher. He moves Accordingly to how fast his class is understanding.
  • . hard to understand and doesnt even know if hes right or wrong most the time.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you do the .
  • and dropping lowest grade made it so you could pass if you tried to.
  • .

Theme 3

❤️ About Helpfulness

  • He takes extra time at the end of his day to explain anything you might still need help with.
  • and for as long as is needed.
  • When I was out sick he helped me get back on track.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

47

Recent reviews read by the AI

47

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

There are 47 reviews with detailed and consistent themes, but the reviews are old and opinions are sharply mixed.

Inside 47 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 527
4 out of 54
3 out of 55
2 out of 57
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH12432 reviews
MATH10811 reviews
C34191 review
MATHABAB1 review
MATHOIWE1 review
Show 1 more courses
MTH1241 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values