AI Rate Professor

History

Sara Stanley

HIST008 · HIST8 · HIST10 · HIST12 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
50/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

if you can handle dry lectures and plan to use and office help to protect your grade.

Best fit · Effort For RewardExtra credit helpsMixed teaching qualityDry lecturesLight workHelpful if asked
  • Grades can be forgiving because and limited work can rescue weak performance.
  • Teaching reviews are sharply mixed, with some students finding her helpful and others calling lectures boring or unclear.
  • , but comments do not clearly prove a .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Getting an A looks very reachable because students mention , little work, and grade recovery through effort.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The workload and content often sound easy, but and assessment mismatch can make the class feel harder.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they do not clearly prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Students and warning that her lectures are boring or ineffective.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

and limited work make grades forgiving for students who complete assignments and ask for help.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

75/100

Students describe little work, fairly easy classwork, and one main test, though .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

She is helpful to some students, but multiple reviews criticize boring lectures and .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Reviews mention homework and a the grade.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe an easy-to-manage class with generous but inconsistent teaching quality.

Main concern

Several students found lectures boring, unclear, or poorly connected to assessments.

What students said

“I went from a D to an A from and doing well on the .”
HIST8
“She doesn't teach the subject very well at all.”
80
“If you do the little work there is you will get an A!”
HIST8

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention a midterm but do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, or .

Midterm MentionedHomework MentionedPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but and proctoring are not clearly proven.

Midterm MentionedPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“doing well on the .”
HIST8
“Our midterm was to define 20 terms”
HIST10

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“class is hard at first but she offers a lot .”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“She doesn't teach the subject very well at all.”

📈 Grade Opportunity

84/100

“I went from a D to an A from and doing well on the .”

⚖️ Workload

75/100

“If you do the little work there is you will get an A!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Ms. Stanley is a bit dry
  • She doesn't teach the subject very well at all.
  • She makes it very BORING!!!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • class is hard at first but she offers a lot .
  • Class work is fairly easy to do and get good grades if you put forth the effort.
  • Extremely easy, played angry birds for the majority of her class and got an A.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

but dated and mixed evidence across several courses.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

HIST83 reviews
801 review
HIST0081 review
HIST101 review
HIST121 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values