AI Rate Professor

Psychology

David Sirianni

PSY4 · PSYC4 · PSYCHOLOGY4 · PSYC · PYCH4 · INDIVSOCP · PSY1 · PSYCH · PSY · PSYCHOLOGY · PSY4163 · PSYCH4 · PSYCH2 · PSYCH1 · 52 lifetime ratings

AI rating
27/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you want a discussion-heavy, opinionated class and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerDisorganizedOff TopicPolarizing ViewsUnclear ExpectationsDiscussion Heavy
  • Students repeatedly describe the class as , and .
  • A smaller , and valuable for open-minded psychology students.
  • Grades can be manageable if students attend, write, and participate, but the workload and expectations feel inconsistent.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

An A is possible for students who show up, write, and participate, but and heavy writing make it far from automatic.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The psychology content is not consistently described as advanced, but the professor's disorganization makes the course feel harder.

because there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

because students mention needing class handouts, quizzes, and group discussions.

because there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Most negative reviews warn against the class because of , and polarizing classroom style.

because there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

Some students call the grade easy if you do the work, but as ambiguous or nonsensical.

Format shift

because there are no online reviews.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Several reviews mention , and busywork despite a few students calling the workload small.

Format shift

All because there are no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Students repeatedly describe him as , and , though some find him caring and interesting.

Format shift

All because there are no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Reviews emphasize , and participation more than formal exams.

Format shift

All because there are no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are highly polarized, but the , and inconsistent expectations.

Main concern

Students , and what the course was supposed to teach.

What students said

“He expects you to teach yourself.”
PSY4
“He makes it boring, hard , and is easily irritated.”
INDIVSOCP
“Great teacher, and interesting person. The class has a lot of work, but you learn a LOT, and it's rewarding at the end.”
PSY4

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and a final, but they do not .

Quizzes MentionedFinal MentionedExam Rules Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a final, but do not clearly prove the exam format, book policy, or proctoring rules.

In-Person QuizzesFinal MentionedExam Rules Not Clearly Proven
“you have to go to class to get the handouts and ”
PSYCH1
“He asked us several times during the final if it was "difficult".”
PSYCH4

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is so utterly incomprehensible when he talks that nobody knows what they are supposed to do.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting recurring themes in , and recommendation risk; credibility rating: Medium.

Teaching Quality

35/100

“He is so utterly incomprehensible when he talks that nobody knows what they are supposed to do.”

Recommendation Risk

32/100

“ . I love psychology and was very disappointed.”

Grade Effort

52/100

“if you show up, do the work and engage in the .”

Theme 1

Teaching Style

  • He never stays on topic.
  • He is a great teacher & a great person.
  • He really cares about helping you learn.

Theme 2

Difficulty And Grades

  • Class is a bunch of busywork, 2 papers a week!
  • The quizes are easy and the work load is very small.
  • Hard class, but very informative about the subject.
  • .

Theme 3

Classroom Experience

  • I dreaded going to this class because you are put into groups in the class that you will have to talk to every class period.
  • He talks alot about very interesting stuff.
  • Class was a waste of time.
  • Students who are open to becoming enlightened will thrive.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

52

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

The 50 in-person reviews give a broad pattern, but many are old, polarized, and several contain little detail.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 56
3 out of 55
2 out of 59
1 out of 519

Course coverage

PSY417 reviews
PSYCH413 reviews
PSYCHOLOGY4 reviews
PSYC43 reviews
PSY2 reviews
Show 9 more courses
PSYC2 reviews
PSYCH2 reviews
INDIVSOCP1 review
PSY11 review
PSY41631 review
PSYCH11 review
PSYCH21 review
PSYCHOLOGY41 review
PYCH41 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values