AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Susan Howard

ANTH32 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
50/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Consider her if you care about the topic and can handle a demanding, potentially uneven classroom experience.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerInteresting MaterialPolarizingRequires StudyEncourages ParticipationPossible Public Criticism
  • The two reviews are completely split, with one calling her amazing and one describing her as mean spirited.
  • The material is consistently described as interesting, but the classroom experience may depend heavily on student fit.
  • Students should expect real studying and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

An A likely requires real studying because the positive review says students have to study, while .

All evidence comes from two in-person ANTH32 reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The material is interesting but not effortless, and as .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they give mixed signals about course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Recommendation depends on fit because while another found her mean and unhelpful.

All and is evenly split.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Reviews do not provide enough grading evidence beyond saying the class requires study.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Workload seems moderate because students must study and and misleading.

Format shift

All workload evidence comes from in-person ANTH32 reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Teaching quality is highly polarized, with one review praising her as amazing and another calling her mean and unhelpful.

Format shift

All teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

, while exams are not discussed.

Format shift

, and it is sparse.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

review and one strongly negative review.

Main concern

A negative review reports public humiliation and .

What students said

“This teacher is amazing!”
ANTH32
“the teacher can be mean spirited, and .”
ANTH32
“You really do have to study for this class but .”
ANTH32

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, book .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You really do have to study for this class but .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“This teacher is amazing!”

⚠️ Classroom Risk

35/100

“the teacher can be mean spirited, and .”

📚 Study Effort

52/100

“You really do have to study for this class but .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This teacher is amazing!
  • the teacher can be mean spirited, and .
  • She offers a lot of information and encourages participation.

Theme 2

📚 About Work And Learning

  • Interesting material, but the teacher can be mean spirited, and .
  • The and misleading.
  • Super interesting topic and she makes it personal and informative.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

, and they directly conflict despite some shared praise for the material.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ANTH322 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values