AI Rate Professor

English

. Grenko

LEAD223 · READ127 · READ225 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
26/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

unless you can tolerate disorganization, strict policies, and a blunt classroom style.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnorganizedRude to studentsClear exam preparationStrict late work policyHighly inconsistent reviews
  • Negative reviews strongly criticize organization, clarity, and tone toward students.
  • Positive reviews say she can teach useful skills and clearly prepare students for exams.
  • Strictness around absences and late work is a recurring concern.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

The course does not sound academically brutal, but and strict late policies raise the effort cost.

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The material appears manageable, but confusion, organization problems, and group or book work make the experience harder.

; there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Students say she has little sympathy for absences and .

and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Most detailed comments discourage taking her because they describe confusion, rudeness, and poor organization.

; there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

and absence policies sound strict, although exam expectations may be clearly provided.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Students mention , and group discussions, but not an overwhelming workload.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

A few students found her clear, but the stronger pattern is confusion, disorganization, and rude interactions.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

, and exams without proving one dominant assessment method.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are polarized, with strong complaints about organization and personality but some praise for and .

Main concern

Students most often complain , and rude treatment.

What students said

“ as a .”
127
“She is the ”
READ127
“She lays everything out that is going to be on the exams.”
READ127

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews say she lays out exam content, but they .

Exams MentionedExam Topics Provided

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and say she provides what will be covered, but .

Exams MentionedExam Topics Provided
“She lays everything out that is going to be on the exams.”
READ127

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ as a .”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“she is always all over the place and .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

35/100

“ . Nor the class, its POINTLESS”

⚖️ Policy Strictness

20/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • She is the
  • .

Theme 2

📚 About Work and Exams

  • All you do is book work and discuss things in groups that are pointless.
  • She lays everything out that is going to be on the exams.

Theme 3

❤️ About Classroom Tone

  • she is very rude and does not help with anything.
  • has made me feel dumb infront of the class on multiple occations.
  • no sympathy.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

66/100

Evidence confidence

Six older reviews provide enough detail, but the opinions are polarized and .

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

READ1272 reviews
READ2252 reviews
1271 review
LEAD2231 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Pass 1