AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Carol Arthur

MATH12 · MATH108 · MATH217 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
10/100
RMP rating
1.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

unless you already know the material and can teach yourself through a poorly structured class.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing InstructorPoor PacingUnhelpful With QuestionsLow RecommendationDisorganized Class
  • All four reviews are negative and .
  • Students say pacing is poor, with slow early review followed by rushed harder material.
  • Several comments describe low support for , and grading.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting an A appears difficult because students describe confusion, weak help, and .

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The material becomes hard because the and the pace reportedly speeds up when topics get difficult.

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews do not clearly .

The in-person .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Students strongly discourage taking her because they found the , and .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

, but one review says she did and another says homework was not graded.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Reviews focus more on poor teaching than workload, so the workload itself is not clearly proven to be heavy or light.

Format shift

In-person comments do not give enough workload detail for a stronger claim.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Students repeatedly describe her as , and unwilling to answer basic questions.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

, and finals, but do not clearly show whether assignments or exams dominate.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews consistently describe , poor pacing, and limited help from the instructor.

Main concern

because explanations and support are described as weak.

What students said

“Take this class if you already know calculus...I was just learning algebra.”
MATH108
“ ~”
MATH12
“ .”
MATH217

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and finals but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and finals, but the .

“Didn't follow syllabus, and didn't want to , and homework.”
MATH12
“One week before finals she says "I'm a little concerned about the pace I've been setting"”
MATH108

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“By far the worst teacher i have had at Butte College.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting repeated complaints about teaching clarity, pacing, and support. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“She is all over the class.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

8/100

“ ~”

⚠️ Course Risk

25/100

“Take this class if you already know calculus...I was just learning algebra.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is all over the class.
  • .
  • Slowly review beginning material .

Theme 2

🧭 About Support And Organization

  • Didn't follow syllabus, and didn't want to , and homework.
  • If you need help, she's says look on the internet, they don't pay me enough
  • Huge waste of my time and resources

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because , but they are consistent and detailed in their criticism.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH122 reviews
MATH1081 review
MATH2171 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values