AI Rate Professor

Design

Deverie Jarrett

ID14 · ID6 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Jarrett may work for students who can follow board notes and complete work independently, but the limited evidence shows real teaching and attitude risk.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConflicting ReviewsDisorganized TeachingEasy A If PresentBoard-Based NotesPoor Attitude Risk
  • The two reviews conflict sharply, with one strongly negative and one positive about note-taking and grades.
  • One student says the class is an easy A if you do the work and show up.
  • The and a bad attitude when students ask for clarification.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

75/100

One review directly says it is an easy A if you do the work and show up, but the evidence is thin and contradicted by a negative review.

All grade-effort evidence comes from two in-person reviews, with no online evidence.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The course has lots of information and one student says the material was poorly presented, so the content experience is not clearly easy.

Only in-person reviews discuss course challenge.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

One review says showing up helps earn an easy A, but no review proves a .

review.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Recommendation is weak because while the other gives only a practical easy-A endorsement.

All and is sharply mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

because doing the work and showing up is described as enough for an easy A.

Format shift

, so confidence is limited.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Reviews mention lots of information and doing the work, but they do not prove an unusually heavy or light workload.

Format shift

Workload evidence .

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Teaching quality is uncertain but concerning because one student reports poor presentation, disorganization, and a bad attitude.

Format shift

In-person reviews conflict, but the negative review is detailed and severe.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

The and showing up, while exams are not mentioned.

Format shift

Assessment evidence comes only from in-person comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person evidence is mixed, with and while another reports disorganization and poor clarification.

Main concern

The and unreceptive when students need clarification.

What students said

“Easy A if you do your work and show up.”
ID14
“She did not present the material very well and .”
ID6
“ !”
ID6

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or major test structure.

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy or format.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easy A if you do your work and show up.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, , and attitude. Credibility rating: Low.

📈 Grade Effort

75/100

“Easy A if you do your work and show up.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“She did not present the material very well and .”

👍 Recommendation Risk

35/100

“ !”

Theme 1

📚 About Grades And Work

  • Lot's of information.
  • Easy A if you do your work and show up.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Writes EVERYTHING on the board; .
  • She did not present the material very well and .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Help And Attitude

  • When I asked for clarification she made me feel like Iit was an inconvenience had a very bad attitude!!
  • !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there are only two old in-person reviews with directly conflicting experiences.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ID141 review
ID61 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values